The threat to Taiwan from China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is increasing by the day and the nation is faced with a large quantity of ballistic missiles. In addition, the PLA’s new generation of fighter jets, naval vessels and long-range missiles are increasing rapidly in quality and quantity.
Taiwan faces a vast disparity in military power with its neighbor and the government must rethink how it remodels the armed forces so that it is prepared for threats.
The conditions unique to Taiwan — in particular its limitations in personnel and resources — mean that it should no longer continue to augment its traditional military hardware, such as fighter jets and warships. Instead, the military should follow a strategy of “limited deterrence, robust defense.”
Over the years, the Ministry of National Defense has based its annual Hankuang military exercises on the following scenario:
The PLA uses large quantities of guided missiles for the initial attack, followed by airborne troops in conjunction with bombers and fighter aircraft complimented by a large number of ships and submarines to enforce a naval blockade, before finally dispatching ground troops using amphibious landing craft for a decisive battle.
According to this set of assumptions, Taiwan’s air force and navy are expected to sustain heavy losses during the opening phase of the battle and it is thought that the military would find it difficult to launch any sort of a counterattack. Given this situation, building a large number of aircraft and naval vessels would be too expensive and a misallocation of resources.
Pursuing a strategy of limited deterrence and robust defense would be the most beneficial policy. Taiwan should use the limited resources at its disposal to provide a limited threat of deterrence to its enemies. Taiwan does not need to compete with China in an arms race.
Instead, the military only needs to be able to strike PLA forces at a distance of several hundred kilometers from the Chinese coast to direct its firepower at PLA military bases that pose the greatest threat to Taiwan. If the military can strike at the bases that form China’s first and second lines of defense — and postpone an attack on Taiwan, giving itself more time to move into place its defensive garrisons — then the nation would be in a position to put into action the second half of the strategy: a robust defense.
The nation must manufacture approximately 1,000 guided missiles, which should be deployed across Taiwan proper, with a small number installed on the outlying islands that form Taiwan’s military front line.
A range of 300km to 600km would be sufficient. This is based on two principles:
First, the PLA Navy and Air Force pose the greatest threat to Taiwan and the majority of China’s naval and air bases are within 600km of Taiwan.
If the military prioritizes the destruction of these bases in a war with China, it could reduce the pressure on its forces stationed on Taiwan proper.
Second, the greater the range of a guided missile, the more expensive it is to produce. Faced with a gradually shrinking defense budget, the military must pursue the most efficient defense strategy possible to bring into play limited deterrence and robust defense.
The nation’s military strategy should be predicated upon building professional and cost-effective armed forces. At a time of limited resources, building a small, but technically advanced, agile military is the only sensible way forward.
Ray Song is a graduate of National Chung Cheng University’s Institute of Strategic and International Affairs and a board member of the New World Independent Living Association in Chiayi.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry