It was a presidential debate, wounded animal edition.
Bleeding supporters and running out of time, Republican US presidential candidate Donald Trump fought and clawed his way through his second debate with his Democratic rival, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
In the process, he gave his base of die-hard supporters the performance they have long wanted, but offered little for the broader audience of Americans still resistant to a Trump presidency.
In a 90-minute encounter filled with insults and interruptions, Trump employed every tactic available to try to move past the campaign-rocking video that had sent his bid into freefall 48 hours earlier.
He showed little contrition and no restraint. He diverted attention to the sex scandals in former US president Bill Clinton’s past. He went stunningly personal, claiming to see “tremendous hate” in his opponent’s heart, referring to her as “the devil” and a liar, and declaring that, if elected, he would put her in jail.
His maneuvering spared no one — not even his Republican vice presidential nominee or his own party.
“I am so disappointed in congressmen, including Republicans, for allowing this to happen,” Trump said, criticizing Republican lawmakers for their handling of the investigation into Clinton’s handling of classified e-mail.
The performance was a vivid display of what has made Trump an unstoppable force in US politics for 15 months. The New York businessman gave voice to long marginalized complaints about the Clintons. He showed he would not be cowed by the crisis or restrained by the conventional norms of civility.
Republicans hoping their badly damaged nominee might take himself out of the race were reminded they should not hold their breath.
Clinton met Trump’s wrath with dismissive smiles and eye rolls.
She began the debate in St Louis, Missouri, quoting first lady Michelle Obama: “When they go low, you go high.”
When Trump repeatedly interrupted her, Clinton chose not to protest — hoping to let her opponent hang himself with his words.
However, her strategy was arguably less effective than in their first outing. When the conversation turned to taxes, Washington politics culture or Clinton’s handling of classified e-mail as secretary of state, Trump was able to land some punches and build some momentum.
“I say it all the time. She talks about healthcare. Why didn’t she do something about it? She talks about taxes. Why didn’t she do something about it?” he said. “With her, it’s all talk and no action.”
Trump was unapologetic about his own tax record. He acknowledged for the first time that he had avoided paying personal federal income taxes for years.
Asked if he would say how many years he had avoided paying taxes, he replied: “No.”
For debate watchers not primed for the battle by conservative radio and media, it was hard to see what new — on either policy or personal trust — Trump presented.
His campaign was already trailing badly with women voters before the video, in which he can be heard describing predatory groping of women. Winning over those voters likely begins with a moment of uncharacteristic humility or candor.
However, Trump’s dismissive remarks on the episode on Sunday — “Certainly I’m not proud of it, but this is locker-room talk” — changed little from the statement he gave on Friday night, even though several Republican leaders deemed it insufficient then and publicly abandoned his campaign.
Although Republican leaders have urged him not to, the candidate could not be deterred from raising the Clinton sex scandals in his defense. With typical showmanship, he gathered three women who have accused Bill Clinton of unwanted sexual advances and sat them in the front of the town-hall style forum.
Trump offered no new policy proposals, or new fluency with issues such as healthcare or national security. Confronted with contradictions in his position and Indiana Governor Mike Pence’s comments on whether the US should be ready to use force to protect civilians in the war in Syria, Trump bluntly rebuked his running mate.
“He and I haven’t spoken, and I disagree. I disagree,” Trump said.
In some respects, Trump’s target audience was not average voters, but Republican leaders, who are in the remarkable position of deliberating whether to continue spending money and time trying to elect their own nominee.
It was unclear whether Trump’s performance helped on that front — although no more Republican officials publicly disavowed him in the immediate aftermath of the debate.
Republican leaders weighing that decision — including calculations about Trump’s effect on their prospects for holding the US senate — can be sure he will not go quietly.
Asked to name something they admire about each other as ended their sparring, Trump declared he respected Clinton’s perseverance.
“She doesn’t quit,” he said.
Neither does he.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry