The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) said it can no longer pay the 18 percent preferential savings interest rate on retired party workers’ pensions. It also said that from this month it had to postpone the payment of party workers’ salaries indefinitely. Could it be that the KMT, which once boasted that it was the wealthiest political party in the world, is facing bankruptcy?
The Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee has been ratcheting up the pressure on the KMT. Reports say that the KMT has been offloading its assets by, for example, selling properties in Tokyo and putting others in New Taipei City’s Jhonghe District (中和) and Taipei’s Ximending (西門町) area on the market. It is also reportedly trying to pay five months’ worth of salaries in advance and has ordered 100,000 party ID cards with prepaid EasyCard functionality to spend the remaining NT$1 billion (US$31.8 million).
To stop the KMT divesting itself of its ill-gotten assets, the committee asked Bank SinoPac and the Bank of Taiwan to freeze the party’s accounts, to prevent the KMT offloading its real-estate assets and withdrawing its liquid assets.
Committee Chairman Wellington Koo (顧立雄) said that the strict measures should encourage the party to transform itself into a democratic political entity.
Successive KMT chairmen have tried to deal with the ill-gotten assets, but none has followed through on these promises, so the hope was that the committee’s hardball approach would prompt the KMT to clear up the assets issue and the preferential interest rate on pensions.
The KMT is beset on all sides. The screws are being tightened, with pressure coming from society and regulations, with the Act Governing the Handling of Ill-gotten Properties by Political Parties and Their Affiliate Organizations (政黨及其附隨組織不當取得財產處理條例) being promulgated, while the committee is squeezing the KMT financially in an unprecedented way.
Still, the KMT leadership seems reluctant to back down and is using its workers as human shields, exploiting a sense of crisis over their salaries to protest against the committee and President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). It is trying to turn the situation to its advantage, accusing the banks and the committee of conspiring to settle political accounts and robbing workers of their salaries.
Dealing with the ill-gotten assets is an important step toward achieving transitional justice, but it has to be handled wisely. The KMT must not be allowed any room for tricks or political manipulation. While the law does give the committee the power to freeze the party’s bank assets, it is supposed to be addressing the results of improper behavior: That has nothing to do with current party workers, and neither should it threaten the KMT’s survival. The party should be allowed to pay workers’ salaries and cover its operational expenditures.
The committee has a legal leg to stand on, but its actions could be seen as cold and risk generating sympathy for the workers, causing people to fall for the KMT’s line that this is all about settling political scores. If the committee is not careful, it could inadvertently be handing the KMT a political stick with which to beat it.
The committee should talk to the KMT and set a ceiling on expenditure based on the party’s personnel and operational needs, so that it can continue to function properly without giving rise to suspicions that it is trying to move assets.
It is not a perfect solution and lets the KMT off the hook, but at least it would lead to less collateral damage.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under