The Cold War is over, and if it was about communism, then communism is dead. It is dead, certainly, as far as any nations that claim the Marxist-Leninist version of it. To be sure, a few nations like Laos and Vietnam still list it as their ideology, but most of the nations that laid claim to represent the principles of “from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs” are nowhere near that mark.
Look down the list of “communist nations”: the Soviet Union and its former satellites of Poland, East Germany, etc., as well as China, Cuba and the others. Where are they now? In each, the past catchphrases of proletariat, bourgeois, comrade, etc. appear to represent a bygone era.
The nations that once avowed Marxist-Leninist ideals and principles have gradually morphed into one-party state dictatorships, where, despite any proposed socialist bent, most have steered toward oligarchies with new people on top. So what is up?
George Orwell provides some insight. He pegged the eventual demise of Soviet Union and the goals of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution with his 1945 allegorical work Animal Farm. Even in 1945, the socialist Orwell noted the overriding influence of the ambition, personality and character of Joseph Stalin and his supporters.
Sure, the Russian tsar and his family were overthrown and replaced, but as in Orwell’s allegory, the pigs stepped forward and as the remaining animals looked on at the end, they had trouble distinguishing the pigs that replaced “Mr Jones” from the other humans.
Orwell’s work could easily have been written to also later apply to the People’s Republic of China, which, under Mao Zedong (毛澤東), and his coterie, came out on top in the Chinese Civil War. That civil war had also begun shortly after the overthrow of a different dynasty, that of the Manchu Empire.
How, then, to separate a claimed ideology and its goals from nationhood and the personal goals, ambitions and megalomania of subsequent national leaders? Mao in his ambition would drag the “new” China through the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, during which he would purge his own supporters to root out “the old.”
However, it would take the pragmatic Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) with his “who cares if it is a black cat or a white cat” economic approach to give the nation a more capitalistic bent and rescue it economically.
And thus, at the end of the day, the result is that the three leading nations with the most millionaires and billionaires are the US, China and Russia. It is unlikely that the goals of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin were to create an additional two nations with the highest number of billionaires and millionaires. Certainly, in all cases the proletariat does not seem to have gained that much better control over the “surplus of its labor” than it previously had.
In each revolution, the individual human factor of greed and the will to rule are too often left out in academic discussions of ideological importance in a nation’s growth and development. What checks and balances are missing?
Today, the growing influence of the global economy continues and the dialectic between Marxist-Leninist thought and capitalism did not end with a capitalistic victory. A new dialectic has developed. If the new world order is global, then it has a new dialectic distinction. It is not so much that of class, but rather that of international corporations and the “haves and have-nots.” This dialectic is about the growing consciousness of the divide between the 98 percent and the 2 percent, no matter what nation people are in.
This disparity that must be addressed in almost all nations raises a different question: Is this imbalance best solved by a form of democracy or that of a one-party state?
Most developing nations cannot follow the path of any of the “big three” — the US, Russia and China — the size alone of these three gives them advantages and resources that other nations do not possess. A different role model in the medium-sized range is needed.
Enter Taiwan, a nation that has been through more twists and turns in the past century than most others as it went from Japanese Empire to one-party state Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) colonialism, the martial law and the White Terror era to a functioning democracy.
This mid-sized nation has a population larger than about 75 percent of the nations in the UN. It also is no “animal farm.” It threw off the KMT that in the parlance of the public were “the pigs that had replaced the Japanese dogs.”
The importance of Taiwan studies takes relevance here; it should not be simply on Taiwan, but rather on lessons gleaned from the potential role model position of a nation that, in addition to achieving a democracy, remains fiscally better off than 75 percent of the other nations in the world.
Taiwan had been free from any past dominant Communist influence not so much because of the KMT, which fled from China after losing the Chinese Civil War. When the 1917 Bolshevik revolution took place in Russia, Taiwan was a thriving part of the Japanese Empire and Japan had always kept Communist influence at bay.
When Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and the KMT came to Taiwan, Communist sympathizers and revolutionaries no doubt followed, but Taiwan was no Chinese Hainan. The KMT one-party state repression that followed earned it the reputation of “killing 100 Taiwanese to find one Communist.”
Economically, Taiwan easily remains in the top 15 to 20 percent of all nations in the world, with a healthcare plan that covers 98 percent of its people. It has done this despite having had to overcome a certain “pariah status” brought on by China in its efforts to keep Taiwan out of the world picture and world organizations.
Taiwan’s democracy possesses a unique identity in the world and in the new world order. As a nation with an export-driven economy, it offers much to be studied, particularly in how nations should address issues of haves and have-nots in a global world. It has chosen the democratic path where the people do not make policy over the barrel of a gun and they can change leaders with ballots, not bullets.
Taiwan is not perfect and it certainly is not resting on any laurels. It has its share of challenges. Nonetheless, its success and efforts and direction provide a new look and direction for studies.
What the study of Taiwan reveals is a nation that threw off the one-party state and 40 years of KMT martial law and the White Terror era to not only become a nation that is fiscally better off than 75 percent of the nations of the world, but one that is a thriving democracy. This is what gives the importance to Taiwan studies and the need to give Taiwan more space on the world stage.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China