In his 1952 novel, Invisible Man, the late Ralph Ellison famously portrayed American blacks as silent, long-suffering and entirely unnoticed by the majority white population. This year, there is a new — and global — invisible class: the 260 million boys and girls who are denied access to basic education.
Today’s invisible victims are refugee children holed up in tents, shacks and hovels who would never enjoy a first day at school; they are the millions of nine-to-12-year-olds condemned to child labor, and the millions of young girls destined for child marriage and denied an education simply because of their gender. Ensuring a better future for these children is the civil rights struggle of our time.
Out-of-school children are losing out because of our failure to invest in education; but so, too, are another 600 million boys and girls who are in school, but not learning. In low and middle-income countries, half of all primary-school-age children do not learn basic literacy and numeracy skills.
All told, 900 million of the world’s 1.4 billion children reach adulthood uneducated or under-educated. According to a forthcoming report from the International Commission on Financing Global Educational Opportunity (the Education Commission), which I chair, members of this neglected majority lack the skills they would need to succeed in a quickly changing global labor market.
In the interconnected world of the future, children will need to be taught information-technology and computational skills if they are to find gainful employment. However, in low-income countries, where technology is most needed to improve educational services and inclusive growth, only 10 percent of pupils attend schools with Internet access.
To close these education gaps, a “business-as-usual” approach is unlikely to suffice. Indeed, by 2030 — the year by which the UN sustainable development agenda promises to deliver universal basic education — 1.5 billion adults would have had no education beyond primary school. Worse still, half the world’s young people would still be entering the workforce with no recognizable qualifications and would probably suffer long periods of unemployment.
For years, the international community has held summits promising to redouble its commitment to education. However, time and again, it has failed to fulfill that promise, thus depriving the next generation of the most valuable gift it could bestow.
In 2002, 13 percent of overseas development aid went to children’s education; today, that figure is 10 percent, and in low-income countries it amounts to no more than US$17 dollars per child, on average.
By short-changing the world’s children, we are squandering the most valuable untapped resource we have. Moreover, we could be setting the stage for a modern doomsday scenario, because an entire generation of uneducated, alienated young people would make easy prey for extremists and terrorist organizations.
Fortunately, how to improve educational outcomes is not a secret: The best schools hire dedicated and competent teachers and administrators, and teach curricula relevant to children’s future needs. Moreover, the Internet enables the poorest children in the remotest areas to access the world’s best libraries and teachers. With auditing and accountability systems, we can make future investments dependent on results, and transform every classroom into a learning hub for every child.
Toward this end, the Education Commission — which includes leaders from government, academia, business and economics — just published a road map and a proposed global budget to provide universal, high-quality primary and secondary education.
Our evidence shows that if developing countries can adopt domestic reforms to match the results of recent success stories, such as Vietnam, they can deliver education for all by 2030.
For our program to succeed, the global investment in education would need to rise steadily from US$1.2 trillion now to US$3 trillion by 2030; and low and middle-income countries would need to modernize their education sectors by increasing their domestic investments to 5.8 percent of national spending, 1.8 percent above the average.
If countries are willing to make this level of commitment, they should not fail to deliver universal education for lack of funding. To ensure that the money is there, the Education Commission is offering detailed proposals to reform the global framework for funding education, and to bring multilateral development banks together to prioritize education and release new resources.
Education is the most cost-effective investment we can make, so the economic case for increased funding could not be clearer. The Education Commission’s goal is to make today and tomorrow’s children a “learning generation.” If we succeed, we expect low-income countries’ per capita GDP to be 70 percent higher by 2050 than it is now.
By contrast, if the world succumbs to inaction and paralysis, we predict that it will cost global GDP US$1.8 trillion by 2050. The brunt of this cost would fall on low-income countries, where 25 percent of populations would still live in extreme poverty. Those are the quantifiable costs of ignoring an invisible generation of young people; the other costs, in terms of lost opportunities and ravaged, alienated lives, are impossible to quantify, but should be equally worrisome.
Gordon Brown, former British prime minister and chancellor of the exchequer, is UN special envoy for global education and chair of the International Commission on Financing Global Education Opportunity.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry