Scientific techniques that can wipe out invasive species or alter mosquitoes’ ability to carry disease are pushing ahead, raising concerns about the ethics of permanently changing the natural world, experts said.
This fast-moving field of science — which involves changing the biology of creatures by interfering with their DNA — is increasingly being debated, not only for human health purposes, but also in conservation circles.
Perhaps the most controversial type of research is known as a “gene drive,” which ensures that a certain trait is passed down from parent to offspring. It eventually leads to genetic changes throughout the entire species.
Illustration: Louise Ting
Projects being considered include one to release altered mice on islands that will only bear male offspring, ensuring an end to future generations, scientists said at the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s World Conservation Congress.
Another idea is to save endangered birds on the Hawaiian islands by releasing altered mosquitoes that cannot carry avian malaria.
The Oxitec mosquito developed by Intrexon is not technically a “gene drive,” but cuts down on the population of mosquitoes by introducing altered males whose offspring cannot survive.
Proponents of gene drive technology say it eliminates the need for polluting pesticides, and could offer a more effective remedy against invasive species than any tool on hand.
However, opponents fear the impacts of permanently altering life forms on Earth and its unknown — and likely irreversible — impact on creatures and ecosystems.
Kevin Esvelt, an assistant professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is among the first scientists to propose using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats gene-editing technology, to alter species.
He is also one of the most cautious voices on its potential uses.
“As a scientist who worked on it, I am particularly concerned, because we scientists are ultimately morally responsible for all the consequences of our work,” Esvelt said at a panel discussion at the congress in Honolulu.
“It should be a requirement that no one gets to build a gene drive or any technology designed to alter the shared environment in a laboratory without making their proposals public first,” he said.
“If something goes wrong in the laboratory, it can affect people outside the laboratory,” Esvelt added.
“That means if you do it behind closed doors — as is traditional in science — then you are not giving people a voice in a decision that might affect them,” he said.
He also said the current regulatory environment is “all based around release, and not really stringent enough, frankly, if you ask me.”
However, others at the same panel called for quick action to preserve imperiled species before they disappear forever due to invasive species and diseases.
“One of the scariest things of working in conservation in Hawaii is there is no way to save these birds from malaria,” said Chris Farmer, Hawaii program director of the American Bird Conservancy.
A total of 38 forest bird species in Hawaii have gone extinct already due in large part to avian diseases, and 21 of the remaining 32 species are at risk, experts say.
By not exploring new technologies, “we are choosing to let these species go extinct,” Farmer said.
Another speaker on the panel, Anthony James, professor of microbiology and molecular genetics at the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, said time is of the essence.
“You have heard the urgency in the voices of my colleagues here worried about the birds and the trees,” he said. “One of the key things that is going to be important for this technology is the ability to get these genes out in a very rapid way in the population.”
According to Floyd Reed, a scientist at the University of Hawaii who is working on a project to alter Culex mosquitoes, which transmit avian malaria to birds, gene drive technologies are incredibly diverse.
Some could theoretically spread from a single small release and genetically transform an entire species, he told reporters via e-mail. “These should be treated extremely cautiously, and there are other types of population modification genetic technology that are safer, geographically self-limiting and reversible.”
At the congress — a meeting of environmentalists and heads of state from around the world that ran from Sept. until yesterday and drew about 9,000 participants to Hawaii — members adopted a motion to refrain “from supporting or endorsing research, including field trials, into the use of gene drives for conservation or other purposes” until a rapid assessment is completed by 2020.
However, the motion is nonbinding and does not prevent anyone from pursuing research.
British primatologist Jane Goodall and dozens of other environmentalists and scientists have signed an open letter expressing concern about the use of gene drives in military, agriculture and conservation.
The letter calls for a halt to all proposals for the use of gene drive technologies “given the obvious dangers of irretrievably releasing genocidal genes into the natural world.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and