It is telling that women feature heavily in the Islamic State group’s (IS) rise and fall. While IS’ craven massacre of Yazidi women in Iraq and Syria helped put it on the map, its gradual downfall is coming partly at the hands of Kurdish women fighting against it on the front lines.
It is easy to see a simple revenge story in this progression, but a deeper reading points to the fundamental role of women in the IS’ ideology and their future role in its denouement.
When the group captured territory in 2014 to establish its self-proclaimed caliphate, it wanted to stage a spectacle that the world would be unable to ignore. So it resorted to the mass abduction, murder, rape and enslavement of women, especially among the minority Yazidis.
The IS’ brutality against its female captives was intended to humiliate the enemy and send a warning to anyone who did not adhere to its extremist, radical interpretation of Islam.
In January and February this year, Human Rights Watch interviewed 15 Yazidi women and girls and 21 Sunni Muslim Arab women who managed to escape from the IS. Most of them spent more than a year in captivity and say they were forced to convert to Islam (if they were not Muslims), enslaved, systematically raped — sometimes by multiple extremist militants — and bought and sold.
These women’s tragic stories suggest that the IS pseudo-state was built on the total subjugation of women, and the group has indeed frequently crafted brutal, misogynistic propaganda to express and promote its ideology.
The IS has institutionalized physical and psychological violence against women through fatwas — religious decrees — issued by senior ideologues. Worse still, this practice has been exported to other extremist groups, such as Boko Haram in West Africa, which pledged allegiance to the IS early last year.
The group’s ideology requires the “erasure” of women’s civil rights and their full subordination to the family structure and the men who control it.
The sanctioned course of a woman’s life is to remain at home and raise young militants to fight for the state. Women who transgress the ideal role of wife and mother by seeking autonomy or self-expression outside the family are severely punished.
This is all based on a perverse interpretation of Islamic law, which, not surprisingly, still operates only in the domain of family law. In this context, women are needed to legitimize a fatwa upholding the ruling ideology; but they also make for useful scapegoats when needed.
Against this backdrop, it is especially ironic to see Kurdish women soldiers in the front line of the US-led coalition fighting the IS in Syria and Iraq.
Recent military operations have reclaimed territory that was long under the IS’ control, including areas south of Mosul, the group’s capital in Iraq. The images from these victories, featuring women, are an antidote to the IS’ poisonous propaganda, and they encourage more women to resist the group’s ideological dictates.
The message seems to be spreading. As the IS’ grip on territory loosens, so, too, does its control over women. The most memorable image from the liberation of the Syrian city of Manbij was that of women burning their burqas and publicly denouncing IS atrocities.
These powerful symbolic gestures will have both short and long-term effects. In the short term, they are a public assertion of women’s autonomy; after so much propaganda and brutality, many in the region no longer thought such behavior was possible. In the long term, images of women actually killing and capturing IS fighters amount to the first nail in the coffin of the group’s ideology, which is founded on the false premise of feminine inferiority.
Because the IS puts women at the center of its ideology, women are a significant hidden threat to it. By demonstrating their personal agency against the IS’ dictates, women freed from its control remind the world that the group has hijacked Islam’s universal values and perverted its teachings.
It is fitting that strong and courageous women should help defeat a group whose founding myth rests on the violent subjugation of women. Women’s role as fighters, perhaps more than anything else, will ensure that the tenets of the IS — particularly its lethal brand of patriarchy — are rejected outright.
Fatima Sadiqi is a professor of linguistics and gender studies at the University of Fez, Morocco, and a recipient of a Woodrow Wilson Center Fellowship.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.