It is telling that women feature heavily in the Islamic State group’s (IS) rise and fall. While IS’ craven massacre of Yazidi women in Iraq and Syria helped put it on the map, its gradual downfall is coming partly at the hands of Kurdish women fighting against it on the front lines.
It is easy to see a simple revenge story in this progression, but a deeper reading points to the fundamental role of women in the IS’ ideology and their future role in its denouement.
When the group captured territory in 2014 to establish its self-proclaimed caliphate, it wanted to stage a spectacle that the world would be unable to ignore. So it resorted to the mass abduction, murder, rape and enslavement of women, especially among the minority Yazidis.
The IS’ brutality against its female captives was intended to humiliate the enemy and send a warning to anyone who did not adhere to its extremist, radical interpretation of Islam.
In January and February this year, Human Rights Watch interviewed 15 Yazidi women and girls and 21 Sunni Muslim Arab women who managed to escape from the IS. Most of them spent more than a year in captivity and say they were forced to convert to Islam (if they were not Muslims), enslaved, systematically raped — sometimes by multiple extremist militants — and bought and sold.
These women’s tragic stories suggest that the IS pseudo-state was built on the total subjugation of women, and the group has indeed frequently crafted brutal, misogynistic propaganda to express and promote its ideology.
The IS has institutionalized physical and psychological violence against women through fatwas — religious decrees — issued by senior ideologues. Worse still, this practice has been exported to other extremist groups, such as Boko Haram in West Africa, which pledged allegiance to the IS early last year.
The group’s ideology requires the “erasure” of women’s civil rights and their full subordination to the family structure and the men who control it.
The sanctioned course of a woman’s life is to remain at home and raise young militants to fight for the state. Women who transgress the ideal role of wife and mother by seeking autonomy or self-expression outside the family are severely punished.
This is all based on a perverse interpretation of Islamic law, which, not surprisingly, still operates only in the domain of family law. In this context, women are needed to legitimize a fatwa upholding the ruling ideology; but they also make for useful scapegoats when needed.
Against this backdrop, it is especially ironic to see Kurdish women soldiers in the front line of the US-led coalition fighting the IS in Syria and Iraq.
Recent military operations have reclaimed territory that was long under the IS’ control, including areas south of Mosul, the group’s capital in Iraq. The images from these victories, featuring women, are an antidote to the IS’ poisonous propaganda, and they encourage more women to resist the group’s ideological dictates.
The message seems to be spreading. As the IS’ grip on territory loosens, so, too, does its control over women. The most memorable image from the liberation of the Syrian city of Manbij was that of women burning their burqas and publicly denouncing IS atrocities.
These powerful symbolic gestures will have both short and long-term effects. In the short term, they are a public assertion of women’s autonomy; after so much propaganda and brutality, many in the region no longer thought such behavior was possible. In the long term, images of women actually killing and capturing IS fighters amount to the first nail in the coffin of the group’s ideology, which is founded on the false premise of feminine inferiority.
Because the IS puts women at the center of its ideology, women are a significant hidden threat to it. By demonstrating their personal agency against the IS’ dictates, women freed from its control remind the world that the group has hijacked Islam’s universal values and perverted its teachings.
It is fitting that strong and courageous women should help defeat a group whose founding myth rests on the violent subjugation of women. Women’s role as fighters, perhaps more than anything else, will ensure that the tenets of the IS — particularly its lethal brand of patriarchy — are rejected outright.
Fatima Sadiqi is a professor of linguistics and gender studies at the University of Fez, Morocco, and a recipient of a Woodrow Wilson Center Fellowship.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to wreak havoc worldwide. Despite countries being under pressure economically and from the novel coronavirus, China’s National People’s Congress last month passed national security legislation for Hong Kong, a decision that has shocked the world. Let there be no doubt: This move is the beginning of the end of China’s plans for “one country, two systems” in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Proposed amendments to extradition laws last year ignited massive protests in Hong Kong, with millions of participants, shocking the world and making confrontation between government forces and those who opposed the change a permanent part of Hong
Protecting domestic workers Ms Heidi Chang’s (張姮燕) article (“Employers need protections too,” May 24, page 6) made the case that “migrant workers’” rights had improved in Taiwan, but employers’ rights had not, going so far as to complain that all employers are treated equally under the law — as though this was not how the law was supposed to work. The truth is that the rights of foreign blue-collar workers have still not caught up with the rights their employers have always enjoyed. This segment of the foreign community in Taiwan is more likely than other groups to encounter abuse. Recently, a care