Media reports last week said that the nation’s first tour operator that specifically catered to Chinese tour groups had filed for bankruptcy. There are concerns that the incident might set off a domino effect, triggering a sense insecurity within the industry. As a result, the industry has appealed for 10,000 workers to take to the streets to put pressure on the government. However, there a few problems with this approach.
First, although the number of Chinese tour groups has been reduced since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office, for a company to go bust in just three months suggests that it might not have been in the best shape in the first place and needed to review its business model.
Second, if 100,000 jobs across the nation are at risk simply because of there are fewer Chinese groups visiting, does that not mean the tourism industry is far too reliant on Chinese tourists? Moreover, if the industry really is hanging on by a thread, does this not show that it has problems and needs to immediately adjust its strategy? And when the Chinese tour groups do not come, is it only Taiwanese that lose out financially?
A friend who runs a travel agency in Hualien and Taipei told me that he never accepts Chinese tour groups.
When I asked why, he said: “I cannot make any money [if I do].”
To secure deals from Chinese tour groups, Taiwanese tour operators are invariably forced to slash prices, with some incurring losses as a result.
Some tour operators rely on the commission they make as guides to Chinese tour groups to make money. However, sometimes the Chinese side runs into debt and is unable to pay.
It is very difficult to operate profitably under such circumstances and this is the main reason that a tour operator can go into receivership in only three months.
Furthermore, although some local governments have repeatedly denied that Chinese investors have infiltrated the local economy, my friend told me that the primary source of capital for a large number of travel agencies, hotels, tour bus operators and even shops comes from Chinese investors. This is the so-called “one dragon” business model — Chinese companies organizing the transportation, shopping, meals, accommodation and other services catering to Chinese tour groups — makes it very difficult for Taiwanese businesses to make money.
For these reasons, my friend does not do business with Chinese tour groups, but instead focuses on the domestic, Japanese, South Korean and Hong Kong markets, which allows for a stable profit.
My friend added that with fewer Chinese tour groups visiting this summer holiday, the quality of tourism in Hualien has improved. Domestic tourist numbers have made a marked recovery, directly benefiting Taiwanese businesses.
This begs the question who has actually lost out the most from the shrinking number of Chinese tourists. It is those businesses that make use of Chinese funds through the “one dragon” business model that are currently licking their wounds.
By reducing the number of Chinese tour groups visiting Taiwan in an attempt to put pressure on the government, Beijing gave Taiwanese an opportunity to reflect on how to improve quality and reform tourism strategy to make the industry more flexible and robust. Putting all your eggs in one basket is not a clever or healthy thing to do.
If Taiwan becomes totally dependent on China, its industries will, like drug addicts, become addicted to Chinese opiate. If one day the drug supply is cut off, it will be curtains for Taiwan.
Hsu Yu-fang is a professor of Chinese literature at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Edward Jones
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this