It is fair to say that among those dependent on public transport, buses do not have a good reputation for turning up on time. So when a model for a sci-fi-looking “straddling bus” capable of gliding over traffic was unveiled in China in May (six years after first being mooted), we can safely say that the hopes of city commuters were, no pun intended, raised.
However, in the case of the so-called Transit Explore Bus (TEB), it seems that potential delays are the least of its troubles. Just one week after a “road test” of the futuristic bus — which, in the words of the Shanghaiist, proved: “They built it. They actually built it” — reports have emerged in the Chinese media suggesting that not only is the bus’ current manifestation completely unfeasible, but that the TEB might even be some kind of elaborate Ponzi scheme.
Such allegations have been indignantly rejected by the designer, Song Youzhou (宋有洲), who told the Web site Sixth Tone: “We haven’t done anything wrong at all. The latest tests show that the bus design is entirely possible.”
BUS ON STILTS
Leaving such murkier allegations aside, the ever-growing list of technical criticisms leveled at the project might seem enough to make Song and his team give up on their radical bus-on-stilts dream.
Perhaps the most cutting criticism of all: Since the TEB runs on tracks, it is technically not even a bus. It is a train.
Even the “road test,” in hindsight, was found by local media to be unconvincing. It took place on a 300m highway and was hardly equivalent to actual traffic conditions.
Was the test just a chance to show that the TEB had actually built something? Anything? Playing it down since, the authorities in Qinhuangdao, where the bus was tested, have said the TEB will just be used for tourism rather than major transportation.
As the likelihood of the TEB coming to fruition in any meaningful way crumbles, descending from transport-solution-of-the-future to a folly evocative of that episode of The Simpsons when Springfield gets a monorail, it looks set to join the ranks of other well meaning, but ultimately futile, urban traffic-solving ideas.
Like, for example, the Hyperloop (emphasis on the “hype”), in which pods full of people would in theory be fired down a large tube at speeds of up to 750mph.
The concept was first put forward by Elon Musk — the guy behind commercial space travel enterprise SpaceX — in 2013, and since then two companies have been competing to make it a reality: Hyperloop Transportation Technologies (HTT) and Hyperloop One.
Recently, Hyperloop One put on a demonstration in the Nevada desert, shooting a test sled down a track at 115mph.
HARDLY REVOLUTIONARY
However, as Guardian tech reporter Alex Hern said, while it did represent a step forward, it is a small one.
“Linear accelerators are nothing new: They’ve been used in rollercoasters for 20 years and slower versions are already used in metro systems all over the world,” Hern wrote.
So, nothing revolutionary just yet.
If it does come to fruition, it will mean people could travel from San Francisco to Los Angeles in just 30 minutes, but — as with commercial space travel — it is still unclear how the project could be economically viable with so many design and development kinks still to be hammered out.
Then there is SkyTran, a “patented, high-speed, low-cost, elevated Personal Rapid Transportation system” based in NASA’s Ames Research Center in California. SkyTran’s design consists of sleek steel and aluminum pods (what is it with pods and the future?) that travel along an elevated maglev track high above the street.
This rapid transit system, developed by NASA engineer Doug Malewicki, would carry two or four people in each pod, with the potential to move them at speeds of up to 155mph. In the case of SkyTran, the argument is that it is far more economical than building an underground system; the company claims it will cost just US$13 million for every mile (1.609km) of track, compared with US$160m per mile of subway.
Still, it is yet to appear in a city. It was due to launch in Tel Aviv in 2014, and then at the end of last year. Now the official line is that a demonstration track will be completed at the end of this year. More recently it was announced that Lagos, Nigeria, would get a SkyTran track by 2020. Fingers crossed.
Keeping in mind that most of these suggestions have barely existed beyond the drawing board, perhaps the best new public transport concept to be presented in recent years is the “cat bus,” which appears as a character in the Japanese animated fantasy film My Neighbor Totoro.
The cat bus can fly, it can take passengers to any destination they want — and, well, it is adorable. And judging by the track record of some other urban transportation ideas doing the rounds, it is also just as likely to happen.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry