Disastrous air pollution
One particularly insidious consequence of Taiwan’s disastrous energy policy is its devastating effects on human health, namely air pollution (“Disastrous energy policy,” Aug. 14, page 6).
Despite a change in government, the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) seems to continue in the same vein of attention-grabbing, but ultimately ineffective fig-leaf environmental policies whose hallmark was also the previous administration’s main achievement over eight thumb-twiddling years (“And here they go again,” Sep. 21, 2014, page 8).
The latest proof in the pudding that not much has changed is the EPA’s newest intended ban (“EPA eyes ban on two-stroke vehicles,” Aug. 12, page 4). Besides coming about a decade too late, this ban would reduce air pollution by perhaps a few percentage points.
However, if during the same period, overall traffic volume increases, then air pollution would effectively remain the same. The same lame-duck attitude applies to the utterly senseless burning of ghost money (“EPA ad promotes greener worship,” Aug. 12, page 3).
Instead of banning this practice which harms everybody’s health, the EPA makes a television commercial which is of course ignored by almost everybody and so air pollution continues unabated.
The EPA continues to fail in its duty to protect public health; instead it protects irresponsible worshipers.
What would be an effective policy? For example, the government promises Taiwanese that they will breathe healthy air within 20 years, meaning that every five years, air pollution must decrease by 25 percent.
Once that goal has been set, the EPA then figures out the most cost-effective and politically desirable way of achieving it, and then continuously monitors air pollution. If it does not decrease, then more efforts are made until the goal is reached.
Most politicians would probably call such a policy unrealistic, but then, nobody had cellphones 20 years ago, and now almost everybody has one, so why should a change from zero to 100 percent be any more difficult to achieve than a change from 100 to zero percent? It is not, except for political expediency, bureaucratic inertia and public apathy.
On the last point, consider how much time have Taiwanese have recently spent on Pokemon Go and how much time on opposing health-damaging public policies (“The asocial allure of ‘Pokemon Go’,” Aug. 12, page 8)? Despite the information and opportunities that the Internet and mobile phones offer in terms of finding important information and engaging in public policies, most people seem to use it for gaming or exchanging fashion tips and cat videos.
So ask yourself: in a generation’s time, when your children ask you what you did to oppose environmental disasters, what will you answer? Oh, I was too busy catching monsters on Pokemon Go?
Given that virtually all environmental experts agree that we are in a global crisis, I can only conclude that most people prefer to stick their heads in the sand and tell their children and grandchildren: well, you know, I was an ostrich back then.
Flora Faun
Taipei
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations