Discussion about judicial reform has been ongoing for nearly 20 years, and the government has consulted with nongovernmental organizations and followed some of their advice. It has amended laws, developed new judicial mechanisms, established evaluation systems and disposed of many outdated things, but the public is not satisfied. Why?
Reform has to take on an intricate and complex constitutional system and court hierarchy, as well as an organism consisting of 2,000 judges, that at its heart is a legal culture that does not encourage rational dialogue.
Those in charge of reform must understand that it is nothing like resolving a traffic jam, where all you need is some determination to remove a bus lane. Nor is it like remote-controlling a camera drone, where you can detect problems from a distance.
The key question with judicial reform is: “How?” This could be achieved by turning the Judicial Yuan into a trial court, but that would be a highly complex constitutional process that could not be completed overnight.
Of course, there are also simple approaches, such as the view that enhancing the power of evaluation and disqualification by external third parties would make judges fall in line.
Anyone who has seen the Japanese anime One Piece knows that its protagonist, Monkey D. Luffy, has a signature combat technique called “Second Gear.” Even though he later learned “Third Gear,” a technique which enables him to fight with enlarged limbs, making him even more powerful, it caused him to shrink afterward.
The current pessimism among judicial practitioners is reason for concern that the stricter the government makes the evaluation system, the less likely justice is to be served, and that the tighter supervision gets, the less conscientious judges will become.
This is why reform must be pragmatic. The main question is how to make more than 2,000 judges — willingly — make fundamental improvements in themselves.
The public’s main expectations on the judiciary are that it will issue just, appropriate and timely verdicts. These three issues are the core of justice and the most crucial parts of judicial reform. Any reform that strays beyond these three issues will miss the point and further complicate matters, rendering it a futile exercise.
Here are five suggestions for how this could be avoided.
First, at a time when populism rules and pundits seem to run the nation, leading judicial officials must be able to use their prestige and constitutional outlook to safeguard the judiciary’s dignity and protect judicial independence, a core constitutional value.
Second, verdicts must be simplified and made understandable for the layman so that the judiciary can use verdicts as part of a dialogue with society at large and gain the public’s understanding and support.
Third, improve the current sentencing information system, simplifying it and making it easier to use, to assist judges in issuing just sentences.
Fourth, case performance evaluations and promotion measures must be completely removed so that judges will determine sentences solely based on conscientiousness, justice and the law, rather than based on considerations of performance and promotion in order to achieve appropriate sentencing.
Fifth, the accumulation of individual case experience and review of each step of the investigation and the judicial process will clarify the impact and function of trials and help streamline the process to avoid overlap and repetition, which will promote timely and effective justice.
Liu Wen-shi is a member of the Contemporary Taiwan Development Foundation’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee.
Translated by Tu Yu-an and Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.