Legislative Speaker Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全) led a delegation of legislators to Japan earlier this month, making a welcome contribution to foreign relations. However, the activities of certain legislators on the visit have drawn accusations that they blurred the line between public and private spheres.
Such transgressions are commonplace in Taiwan and are even perfectly normal in many people’s eyes. If the criticisms lead people to reflect on this phenomenon and seek improvements, that would be a good thing.
Human progress aims to pursue and protect individual rights and freedoms, but individuals are members of society and must follow the basic social rule of not infringing on the rights and freedoms of others. However, in real life Taiwanese often fail to separate public and private affairs, even allowing their private interests to detract from the public good.
It is so common for politicians to misuse government money or use public projects for private profit that people might think nothing of it. It is hardly newsworthy if somebody calls an ambulance when they could make their own way to hospital, or if people trekking in the mountains use rescue helicopters as a quick way to get back down.
Pedestrian crossings seem to be just for decoration, while people ride scooters and bicycles in the wrong direction or along the sidewalk. Drivers do not like giving way when they turn left — they would rather speed up to get through first. When drivers park illegally at the side of the road or at bus stops, they blame a lack of parking spaces.
People who live on the top floor of older apartment blocks occupy the roof space for themselves, while those on the ground floor treat the basement as their own. In newer blocks, it is common for residents to build balcony extensions.
Being rowdy or having loud telephone conversations on public transport, polluting the air by burning ghost money and filling the neighborhood with cooking smells are other common selfish acts.
Taiwanese have not always been so unruly. The generation who grew up under Japanese rule received an education that stressed moral cultivation. They learned not to spit and urinate in random places and to maintain good hygiene and a smart appearance. They got into the habit of being quiet and polite instead of rowdy, and of being considerate instead of causing trouble.
This kind of education fostered self-discipline and personal cultivation, and it shows itself in the social civility that is characteristic of that generation.
Unfortunately, the Chinese culture that took over in the post-World War II years paid scant heed to this basic training. Learning for life gave way to the pursuit of qualifications and further education. Later on, the generations who did not receive adequate education for life have themselves become parents and teachers, so their attitudes of putting oneself first and ignoring the needs of others have become ever more widespread. As a result, Taiwanese still lag behind more advanced societies in terms of civility.
Some encouraging developments have been seen in recent years, such as not eating or drinking in mass rapid transit systems, standing to one side on escalators and not grabbing priority seats. These courtesies are at least a good beginning.
If Taiwan is to become a truly civilized society, people must learn to exercise self-discipline and draw a clear line between public and private affairs. Some Japanese-educated people are still with us as role models. However, as that generation fades into history, people will have to think for themselves about how to make things better.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an adviser to the Taipei Times.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with