If Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), the former legislative speaker, takes over as chairman of the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF), he will not be the blank slate that foundation Chairman Lin Join-sane (林中森) has been.
Wang does not brag about his accomplishments, but the private talks that he held with American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Chairman Raymond Burghardt eight years ago are a good measure of Wang’s suitability for the position.
Lin was former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) errand boy, and he handled some trivial issues of a technical nature.
He was a blank slate that Ma could fill with anything he wanted, and he never did anything that was not in line with Ma’s wishes, nor would there ever be any traces of concern for Taiwan or Taiwan’s interests.
Wang plays in another league altogether. The frequency with which he used to hold conversations and meetings with officials at the AIT gives just a little glimpse of his stature.
His comments have always been spot-on, he understands public opinion and has never been led by the nose by Ma or the KMT.
At the time of the Sunflower movement in 2014, Wang took a sympathetic attitude toward the students and their demands, which should not have been a surprise to anyone.
On March 16, 2009, he told Burghardt that former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) had appointed him to hold talks with China on the three direct links, financial management and investment and student exchanges.
According to Wang, the talks were concluded, but because Beijing was unwilling to allow the Chen administration to claim any kind of credit for rapprochement and the KMT was worried about Chen being allowed to do so for fear it would have had a negative impact on Ma’s presidential aspirations, the agreements were never signed.
Wang is of the opinion that it was the talks that he concluded with China that allowed the Ma administration to reach agreements with Beijing on these issues and to sign agreements so soon after Ma took office.
Wang complained that the Ma administration would not allow these agreements to go to the legislature for review, which resulted in the public feeling that it had no say in the matter.
This was also why Wang insisted on the necessity of submitting the cross-strait service trade agreement to the legislature for review.
Of course, Ma paid no attention to what Wang said, which he felt was grating on the ear. His only concern was to give Beijing a quick answer, and he was worried that the legislature would create problems and slow things down.
This was why the KMT tried to ram the service trade agreement through the legislature.
However, when then-KMT legislator Chang Ching-chung (張慶忠) took just 30 seconds to announce that the pact had cleared committee review, it was the spark that ignited the Sunflower student protests.
In a conversation on Feb. 18, 2009, Wang told then-AIT director Stephen Young that no one in the Chinese leadership would dare change the “one China” or the unification goal.
He therefore suggested that Ma should approach his administration’s cross-strait policy proposals by answering three questions: Will they harm Taiwan’s sovereignty, security or the interests of all Taiwanese?
If Wang gets lucky in his old age and is appointed chairman of the Straits Exchange Foundation, hopefully he will remember these three questions.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry