A T-72 tank roared into the jump at full speed, launching several feet into the air.
“Ooooohhhh!” several spectators yelled as it slammed back down so hard its gun barrel nearly hit the ground.
A second T-72 followed behind, but suddenly everyone’s attention was directed behind them as strong winds ripped the metal-and-tarpaulin roof off the grandstands. The spectators climbed over the barriers to escape as rain poured down.
Illustration: Mountain people
This was the tank biathlon, a sport devised by Russia in 2013, ostensibly to allow its own tank forces and those of other countries to test their equipment, but it also serves as a patriotic spectacle and a show of military might held with an eye on the West.
It is part of the huge International Army Games taking place across Russia and Kazakhstan, which also include competitions among jet fighters, air-defense systems, artillery and paratroopers.
More than 3,000 personnel are taking part from Russia and 18 friendly countries, such as Angola, Venezuela, Serbia and several former Soviet republics.
Dmitry Panin, a doctor who had come on a “patriotic impulse,” said the competition was a display of military prowess and a way to “unify the nation.”
“It’s to raise our country’s status, to show that we are a world power and will remain so,” he added.
As the deafening reports of tank shots boomed across the field, Nikolai Kudryavtsev, who once served in a tank brigade himself, said: “It shows mastery — it shows who’s better prepared among these countries. NATO refused to come because they’re afraid.”
Russia has found itself at the center of several scandals in recent weeks, provoking outrage abroad, but defiance at home.
First, sporting authorities suspended the Russian track and field team and almost banned the entire country from the Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games following findings of state-sponsored doping.
Then US officials and experts suggested the Kremlin was most likely behind an e-mail hack that showed the US Democratic National Committee’s desperation that former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton should triumph over US Senator Bernie Sanders in the battle for the US Democrats’ presidential nomination.
The furore over the e-mails was a boost for US Republican candidate Donald Trump, who has previously spoken of his admiration for the leadership qualities of Russian President Vladimir Putin, and intimated he would move to lift sanctions on Moscow.
Responding to the doping scandal, Putin promised reforms, but also rejected the accusations as “interference of politics in sport” and the track team ban as “open discrimination.”
Russian Minster of Sport Vitaly Mutko has repeatedly said that Russia is being singled out for what is a worldwide problem.
Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov said he could not respond to the e-mail hack suspicions without using four-letter words.
As their officials lashed out on national television at the West for its alleged prejudices and attacks on the country, many Russians expressed similar opinions.
In a survey published late last month by state pollster the Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VTsIOM), 55 percent said the accusations of mass doping were groundless and the result of a “political hit job” by Russia’s Olympic competitors.
Another 31 percent said doping existed in other countries and punishing only Russia was an “injustice.”
A whopping 89 percent supported the actions of Putin, who has dismissed officials named in World Anti-Doping Agency investigations, but said further evidence must be presented to back the accusations.
A survey by the independent Levada Center, released on Sunday, showed 71 percent thought the agency’s evidence of systematic doping by Russia was not convincing; 83 percent disapproved of talks about banning Russia from the Olympics.
“Of course, it’s politics,” said Grigory Klimov, a former athletics coach, when asked about the doping scandal.
He was in the stands at Stars 2016, a track meet for Russia’s banned athletes, which the media dubbed an alternative Olympics.
“Sanctions aren’t working. We are surviving and even flourishing. So how can they get us? Take away the Olympics from us,” Klimov said.
Klimov recalled the US and Soviet Olympic boycotts of the 1980s.
Now Russians are again “upset” over big sport, he said.
“It’s not fair. There shouldn’t be collective responsibility,” he added. “There should be a presumption of innocence. How can I answer for my comrade?”
“How do I know what he took?” Kilmov added.
The coach, Alexander Tsyplakov, similarly drew a parallel with the Cold War, which he said had never ended: “Cold War, hot war and information war. There’s always victims and ruined fates.”
Tsyplakov said the doping accusations had been made up, expressing an increasingly widespread belief that a plot is afoot to deprive Russia of the 2018 World Cup.
“It’s propaganda — they need to get at Russia to take away the World Cup,” said Kudryavtsev, a former tank brigade soldier.
His words suggested a standoff with the West was very much alive, as was a lingering sense of resentment.
“Russia for its entire history has never kneeled to anyone. Now the Americans think they’re the fucking best,” he said. “Russia is a great country, but [US President Barack] Obama spits on it. Obama is a monkey and an ass.”
Like many Russians, Kudryavtsev’s opinion of Trump was much higher, since the candidate “says he’ll be friends with Russia.”
An April YouGov poll found that the only G20 country where Trump was viewed more favorably than Clinton was Russia.
Whereas Clinton is associated with the failed “reset” of relations with Russia in 2009 and the NATO bombing in Libya, Trump is seen as a break in these tensions, according to pollsters.
The hacking scandal has not been covered widely in the Russian media, which is dominated by state television channels, but when told about the e-mail hacking suspicions, Kudryavtsev called them “nonsense.”
According to Valery Fyodorov, head of VTsIOM, Russians instinctively distrust the West after the booms in poverty and crime during the US-style market reforms of the 1990s, as well as the NATO bombing of Russian ally Serbia in 1999.
“We think the West is a very hypocritical force that hides its intentions behind pretty words,” Fyodorov said. “Since [the 1990s] we take the messages of the West as their opposite. If the West praises us, that means we are doing something not right, because enemies don’t praise, and if they praise us we are doing something against our interests.”
However, Levada Center head Lev Gudkov said Russians’ anti-Western sentiments are the result of a “besieged fortress” mentality the government has promoted for its own legitimation.
The tank biathlon and Army Games are one of several martial events to have gained prominence in recent years, along with the huge parade on Red Square for Victory Day and the celebration of the annexation of Crimea.
“I don’t remember such an intensive militaristic manufacturing of public opinion, not even in Soviet times,” Gudkov said.
The rejection of doping accusations and the ignorance over the hacking scandal were a result of the coverage of state television, he said, the main source of news for Russians.
“We only see the effects of this propaganda, especially in the foreign sphere. Here it is built on a confrontation with the West — in conditions of crisis it’s the only way to facilitate the unity of society... It helps them come to terms with their living standards and not blame the authorities. If it’s war, it’s war, and you need to support the leadership,” Gudkov said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry