Since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and her government took office and began preparing to reform the pension system, the role of government employees — military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers — has become an important factor. It is natural that these groups would work hard to protect their own interests; there is nothing wrong with that.
However, as they protect these interests, it is impossible not to ask the following question: The government has done a lot for these groups, but what have they done for the nation in return?
First, they are talking an awful lot about the principle of legitimate expectation, when what people should be doing is looking at the historical background behind their benefits. In the past, the wages of military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers were relatively low, while the nation’s economy was growing steadily.
However, while these groups were given large wage increases, the economic situation has been in a constant state of decline.
If, given this situation, they continue to insist on the principle of legitimate expectation, are they really doing right by the nation?
Second, Ministry of Civil Service data showed that there are 135,224 retired government employees and they receive a monthly pension of NT$56,383 (US$1,766) on average, which includes an 18 percent preferential savings interest rate. That is about NT$20,000 more than the regular monthly pension that a private-sector employee receives.
In addition, the 18 percent preferential interest rate alone sets the government back NT$82.4 billion every year.
Furthermore, over the past 20 years, the average retirement age of civil servants has moved in the opposite direction of the retirement age in other nations: It has been falling. In 1996, the average retirement age for these groups in Taiwan was 61.14, but by last year, it had dropped to 55.72.
Based on the average life expectancy in Taiwan — 79.84 — such retirees would receive a pension for 24 years. Rewarding these groups by putting the cart before the horse clearly eats into the resources of the working public at large.
In particular, now that mid-level management is slowly shrinking, it makes one wonder if those government employees that are still working, but wish to go into retirement do not feel a sense of shame.
There is more: The public has a lot to say about government employees and their performance, in particular as people can see how the nation’s competitiveness is declining instead of improving; the armed forces’ image problem; administrative inefficiency in the government bureaucracy; and ineffectual educational reform.
If government employees continue to talk about the principle of legitimate expectations when this is the impression they are giving the general public, there is a risk that the only result would be an even stronger backlash against them.
No one is opposing the idea that government employees should be given reasonable protection and guarantees, but the current system clearly provides excessive protection and it is also distorting the way national resources are distributed.
While people are professionally active, it makes sense that they should be able to guarantee the livelihood of a family, but after retirement, it should be enough to provide resources that are sufficient to guarantee the livelihood of one person. Is it reasonable to demand that people be able to raise a whole family upon retirement?
No one is opposed to military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers working hard to protect their interests, but — while it is true that people in general try to protect their vested interests — a sincere suggestion is that these groups should not blindly try to safeguard their interests at the cost of losing the last thread of respect in the eyes of the public. Would their wealth really be worth it if they lost all dignity and respect?
Li Kuan-long is a lecturer at the Kaohsiung Campus of Shih Chien University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry