During the last meeting of this year’s first legislative session on Friday last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus proposed a vote on each of the 276 items on the floor agenda in an attempt to block the passage of a draft bill on ill-gotten party assets that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is pushing.
The dragged-out voting procedure blocked the bill’s passage.
Be it legislative or other matters, democratic parliaments proceed through debate. In exercising their freedom of speech, US senators can speak for an unlimited time in what is called a “filibuster.” Senators from minority parties who are unable to block a bill or who want to achieve a certain goal give marathon speeches — during which they are not allowed to eat or even go to the bathroom — in order to block a bill from going to a vote.
US Senator Strom Thurmond set the filibuster record in 1957, when he spoke for 24 hours and 18 minutes in an attempt to block the US’ Civil Rights Act. In 1975, the US Senate changed its rules so that a filibuster can be ended, which is called “cloture,” through a vote by three-fifths of all senators.
In a more recent example, a South Korean opposition senator in March spoke for 11 hours and 39 minutes in an attempt to block anti-terrorism legislation.
A filibuster in the US House of Representatives can be brought to an end by a simple majority, while the House of Commons in the UK requires that an address must be directly related to the bill under discussion, with the result that similar situations do not occur there.
In the Legislative Yuan, the speaker announces how long a lawmaker can speak for, and if that time is exceeded, the lawmaker is interrupted by the speaker. Filibusters are replaced by occupations of the speaker’s podium or other methods to paralyze the agenda.
In 1999, the New Party rallied 25 lawmakers to propose a bill that put pressure on the KMT and then-legislative speaker Liu Sung-pan (劉松藩), as the legislature was about to pass five bills regulating the workings of the legislature. They did so to persuade Liu and the KMT to include caucus regulations in the Act Governing the Exercise of Legislative Power (立法院職權行使法) and the legislative agenda rules that were in line with the Organic Law of the Legislative Yuan (立院組織法).
According to the proposed rules, a legislative caucus would be allowed to propose a bill — unless barred by the Constitution — thus removing restrictions on the number of lawmakers required to sign a draft bill or motion.
This means that caucuses can make proposals without requiring 20 signatures on motions, 15 signatures on legal bills and revotes, and 10 signatures for other proposals. A stamp is held by a caucus officials so that the official, without caucus confirmation, can fill in paperwork and give caucus approval. This is both simple and convenient.
However, this is also the reason there are frequent motions for reconsideration, requests for caucus talks or revotes on proposals, as the arrangement is being increasingly abused. The use of a huge amount of proposals to block the party assets bill is an even rarer event, and the lack of restriction on proposals a party caucus can submit must be discussed.
To increase the scientific and democratic foundation for decisionmaking, the legislative agenda should be focused on debate. The merit of legislative debates should be decided by rational means and not by abusing caucus proposal rights and obstructing the agenda. The legislature must establish debate rules as soon as possible.
Lo Chuan-hsien is an adjunct professor of law at Central Police University and a former director-general of the Legislative Yuan’s Legislative Bureau.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry