The fire on Tuesday on a tour bus that killed 24 Chinese tourists and two Taiwanese — the driver and a tour guide — marked the highest number of fatalities in six years in an incident involving a Chinese tour group in Taiwan.
While the investigation into the causes of the heart-wrenching incident is still under way, concerns have been voiced over the safety of overseas tourists in Taiwan and the operations of Chinese travel agencies that offer cheap group tours.
According to preliminary results of the investigation, two instances of human error have been pinpointed as possible causes of the incident.
The first is that the bus proprietor converted the vehicle’s electical system from 24 volts to 110 volts, which might have caused an overload. The second is that a lock was installed on an emergency exit, purportedly to prevent theft, which might have been the reason those onboard were unable to escape and why outside help could not reach them.
Although Minister of Transportation and Communications Hochen Tan (賀陳旦) pledged to conduct a full-scale inspection of the nation’s 17,000 tour buses to examine their equipment and safety, the public remains gravely concerned about the quality of sightseeing buses.
Such worries are evidenced by netizens’ dredging up of an article penned in 2011 by Wu Pei-li (吳培俐), a family member of one of the 23 people killed in a 1992 fire on a bus carrying kindergarten students.
Wu said in the article that at the time, the Chinese government realized the danger of sealed windows following two bus fires, but its Taiwanese counterpart still allowed owners of large motor vehicles to choose between push-out and sealed windows that came with a window breaker.
Wu on Wednesday told the Chinese-language Apple Daily that while the Ministry of Transportation and Communications revised its regulations and mandated that large motor vehicles manufactured from this year onward be equipped with at least three emergency exit windows, a full-scale retirement of old buses might not be possible for two or three decades.
“In other words, passengers still have to travel by what Chinese netizens sarcastically dub “mobile coffins” for another 20 to 30 years,” Wu said.
However, although these otherwise avoidable mistakes no doubt contributed to Tuesday’s death toll, an underlying cause could be the so-called continuous line service, also known as the “one dragon” service. As part of the service, Chinese travel agencies use cheap travel packages, while everything from transportation, shopping and meals to accommodation is provided by Chinese-funded companies.
To maximize their profits, these travel agencies strive to save money on transportation, food and the hiring of tour guides, as commissions paid by souvenir stores are their primary revenue source.
According to statistics compiled by the Tourism Bureau, only 12.78 percent of Chinese tour groups’ expenditure in Taiwan last year went on transportation, compared with 27.59 percent spent by Japanese tour groups.
While money does not always guarantee quality, these figures send a worrisome message that Chinese travel agencies care little about the quality of the tour buses they rent, even though that is closely related to the safety of travelers.
The responsibility to ensure the safety of Chinese tourists falls on the governments of both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
It is time for talks about the dwindling number of Chinese tourists to Taiwan — reportedly due to President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) refusal to “fall in line” — to take a back seat to concrete efforts to improve tourist safety and reform the profit-centered mindset of the tourism industry.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under