The accidental firing of a missile into the Taiwan Strait earlier this month killed one fisherman and injured three. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) described the accident as a result of the military’s lax management and discipline, and called it a systemic failure.
The missile blunder is evidence of deeper, longstanding problems in the military. While the government must push for military reform, the key will be finding the cause of the failure and dealing with it.
It is beyond doubt that former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) left his successor a lot of problems. Tsai is clearly not to be blamed, as these problems existed before she took office.
However, if they have always been there, why did they only make themselves felt a little over a month after she took office? Was she simply unlucky, or could it be that the transfer of government created more problems, bringing things to a head? Luck is likely a factor, but the latter is also worth considering.
When addressing systemic problems in the military, it is necessary to start with the obvious, which includes, as Tsai said, improving precision weaponry controls and providing better training standards for officers.
However, such measures alone are not enough. To solve the problem, the government must also address the many issues that have risen from two rushed policies: former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) policy to shorten mandatory military service terms, and the voluntary military service program implemented by the Ma administration.
Since leading figures from the two main parties participated in the process that led to both programs, both are responsible.
The strongest public proponent of reducing the compulsory military service was former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) during his 2004 presidential bid, when he proposed that the 20-month conscription period be cut to three months.
Following this suggestion, the Chen administration began making annual cuts to the conscription terms and by 2008, it had been reduced to one year. It is already questionable if one year is sufficient to acquire the necessary battle preparedness, but when Ma took office in 2008, he announced that a voluntary military service would be implemented in five to six years’ time and that the proportion made up by that service would be gradually expanded each year.
Eight years later, a lack of concern for national defense needs and disregard for Taiwan’s rapidly changing demographics has seen this negative policy consolidated and now harder to change.
The Ministry of National Defense last year discovered that by the end of this year the estimated number of voluntary force members would be about 150,000, well short of the required minimum — 170,000 to 175,000. The ministry then announced that it would draft men born in 1993 or earlier to make up for the shortfall, and that the policy according to which men born in 1994 or later would do only four months of military training would remain unchanged.
With a voluntary military, the number of soldiers cannot be controlled, and as the birthrate declines, maintaining a certain strike force organization will become increasingly difficult.
In addition, conscripts only get four months of training, which means they are likely to have serious shortcomings in their technical skills and expertise. After demobilization, they will be called in for a five-day training session within two years.
If there is war, it is easy to question whether such reserve troops would be of any use.
The challenge is how to fix this worst-case scenario.
The navy’s stance on the accidental missile launch is that the captain of the corvette involved only had been in his position for about a month, and that he was in a meeting when the incident occurred.
Standard operating procedures dictate that several officers should observe operations, but the petty officer second class who launched the missile told prosecutors it was the first time he had done this exercise in his three years of service, and that he was nervous. That was why he decided to make sure that the system was okay, but a mistake set off the missile. These two accounts imply that this was not only a problem with the supervisory system: The test will be if there are sufficient numbers of trained volunteer soldiers over the next few years.
Following the incident, Tsai said that she would implement far-reaching national defense reforms. While this is something to anticipate, we should also remind ourselves that before discussing domestic production of warships and aircraft and defense industry reforms, the actual military must be firmly under control.
If that is not done, it will not matter how advanced the weapons we can manufacture are: The killing of a Taiwanese fishing boat captain by an accident is a warning of what will happen if we do not have soldiers with the skills to operate them.
Translated by Tu Yu-an and Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry