The kind of mistake that should never be allowed to take place has, in fact, taken place in the Republic of China (ROC) Navy: the accidental launch of a Hsiung Feng III anti-ship missile. In a situation like this, it would only be natural that the utmost care be taken to reveal the truth behind the incident and to fix the shortcomings that made it possible to prevent something similar from ever happening again.
Instead, a hurried and incomplete explanation has set off endless speculation and political posturing turning the focus toward China and demanding that the minister of national defense take full responsibility for the event.
If Taiwan had the ambition to “reconquer the mainland” as the phrase went during the authoritarian era, then the Hsiung Feng III missile could of course serve as an offensive weapon. It is just that Taiwan’s national defense is focused on just that — defense and preventing invasion. It is not built on the idea of aggression against other states. The Hsiung Feng III missile is basically a defensive weapon aimed at deterring and opposing a foreign attack.
Who will worry about a missile that flies 150km? Countries in Taiwan’s vicinity, such as Japan, South Korea, Vietnam or the Philippines, certainly will not, nor will the US, which is working hard to promote free navigation in international waters, because there is no animosity between these countries and Taiwan.
The only country that would use such an incident even as an opportunity to make noise is China, which still refuses to abandon its ambition to annex Taiwan by military means, if neccessary.
China fears that Taiwan will develop nuclear arms capabilities, but the nuclear arms program was detected and blocked by the US during the presidency of late president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國). China does not fear the Hsiung Feng III, and it only made routine protests when the US sold Taiwan Harpoon missiles, which are similar to the Hsiung Feng III.
The reason for this is that Taiwan will not attack anyone — it is only interested in its own self-defense.
Still, Beijing’s propaganda machinery and media mouthpieces want to use this incident to interfere with the administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), force her government to recognize the “1992 consensus” and stir up divisions within Taiwan to meets its political goals of weakening Taiwan’s sovereignty and national defense.
That the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Mainland Affairs Council on their own initiative informed neighboring countries of an incident that occurred within the nation’s territorial waters is quite considerate, and with the exception of China, every country has responded to the information in a friendly manner.
China never informs Taiwan about its military exercises, but still it wants Taiwan to report any accidents to Beijing.
It is pretty clear that China has ulterior motives.
When it comes down to it, the Hsiung Feng III incident was a domestic matter.
The military should engage in some thorough reflection, improve military discipline and reshape the military’s image as an organization that protects the country and its people.
This is the only way to regain public trust and respect.
When dealing with such a serious matter, the ruling and opposition parties should abandon their bloodthirstiness and infighting and instead adopt a cooler and more detached stance as they make stern demands for national defense reform and stronger military discipline.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and