The nation suffered a double blow on Thursday night into Friday morning: an explosion on a Taiwan Railways Administration train bound from Hsinchu to Keelung that injured 25 people, and the damage wrought to Taitung and elsewhere as Typhoon Nepartak battered the south, injuring at least 82 people.
While the government’s and the public’s attention focused on those incidents, we must not lose sight of — and interest in — the tragedy in New Taipei City earlier in the week that left six elderly women at the Le Huo Nursing Center (樂活老人長照) dead and 28 other residents injured.
An investigation into the cause of the fire that broke out early on Tuesday morning is under way, and questions have already been raised about the staffing levels of the center, which had seven employees.
Yet a bigger question needs to be addressed, not just for the sake of the victims’ families and the surviving residents, but for the nation as a whole, with its rapidly graying population.
New Taipei City Deputy Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said the facility had passed fire and safety inspections, including one in April, when it received an “A” rating.
Yet did no one at the local or central government level ever question whether placing a long-term care center catering largely to elderly people, many who require wheelchairs or are bedridden, on the eighth floor of a 10-story building was appropriate?
Even without the risk of a fire, given that the nation is frequently threatened by typhoons and earthquakes, the possibility that an emergency evacuation might be needed should be a key factor when conducting risk assessments on such facilities.
Did the nation learn nothing from the Oct. 23, 2012, blaze on the second floor of the Beimen Sinying branch of Tainan Hospital that killed 12 patients and injured more than 70? While that was a case of arson, the floor housed bedridden patients with chronic diseases, many of whom were hooked up to machines, as well as mentally ill patients. Firefighters blamed the heavy casualties on the patients’ lack of mobility.
Nursing home fires occur the world over and unfortunately there are frequently casualties, even in facilities that are just two or three stories high, despite firefighters’ best efforts.
So why should the risk of casualties be heightened by allowing such facilities on the higher floors of buildings?
The government has been working to improve the nation’s nursing homes for many years. In 2007, the Ministry of the Interior adopted a new set of workforce and equipment standards for nursing homes, public and private, with a five-year period for their introduction. In 2008, the Executive Yuan launched a 10-year program to reorganize and improve the nation’s long-term care system. On May 15 last year, the legislature passed the Long-Term Care Services Act (長期照護服務法) after four years of review, although the law is not expected to take effect until 2018 at the earliest.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has said that building up a long-term care system would be one of her government’s priorities — as is working out a program to fund such care.
According to Ministry of Health and Welfare statistics last year, 16.4 percent of the nation’s senior citizens, or about 470,000 people, require long-term care. Given that this percentage will only increase, everyone should be concerned about the care options and facilities available.
With Taiwan’s population density and high property prices, it is always going to be difficult to find appropriate sites for nursing homes and long-term care centers, especially in urban areas. However, the time when facilities could be plopped down in residential complexes or other high-rises should come to an end. The nation should not have to endure more Le Huo tragedies.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry