The Hsiung FENG III missile, one of which was accidentally fired by a Republic of China Navy vessel on Friday last week, was designed to target ocean-bound enemy vessels. Its maximum range means it can reach as far as the coast of China’s Fujian Province. It does not pose a threat to China’s inland areas. However, in terms of international relations, the missile blunder does pose a grave challenge to regional safety. To ignore that is dangerous.
There have long been tensions between neighboring countries in the Asia-Pacific region, especially in East Asia, where any two nations have spent more time with hackles raised than enjoying peaceful relations. Jingoism only compounds the situation — it leaves very little space for rational negotiations.
In the West, potential tensions are mitigated with political alliances such as the EU and military alliances such as NATO. These are lacking in the Asia-Pacific region.
Precisely because there is long-standing antagonism in the region and Taiwan happens to occupy the central position in the first island chain, Taipei must be extra prudent and handle foreign relations with pragmatism and flexibility.
Taiwan’s primary hypothetical threat from the north and south comes from China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Taiwan has shown no ambition to expand its territory. However, a missile accidentally discharged by Taiwan, although not landing beyond the Taiwan Strait’s median line, could disrupt freedom of navigation in the Strait. As the missile was fired without warning, the cross-strait situation might have been severely aggravated.
Taiwan’s ability to impose the required level of military discipline might be questioned, and this could affect its participation in regional military cooperation and even its attempt to secure arms sales. The incident reveals the insufficiency of a hierarchy of control and safety measures in the military, which for a long time has only undergone training and not fought a campaign. It is evident that the military’s command and control system is seriously flawed.
The new government should fight to establish total command of the military and let military bureaucrats run it, while reaching out to other nations by taking part in regional military cooperation and exchanges.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) should exercise her role as commander-in-chief with more delicacy and depth. The training of a low-ranking military officer is already cumbersome enough, so frequent inspections are inappropriate.
However, what she can do is visit veterans on important holidays and listen to their advice — thus showing them the proper respect. She could also implement fair promotions for officers, take part in strategic deployments and systematically promote military bureaucrats. So far, most high-ranking military bureaucrats have been transferred from military offices, even though the National Defense Act (國防法) and the Organization Act of the Ministry of National Defense (國防部組織法) were implemented more than 10 years ago.
It is urgent that mutual trust and interactions between Taiwan and other nations in the region are enhanced. In the Asia-Pacific region, Taiwan is one of the very few nations that do not observe PLA operations by engaging in military exercises with other nations in the region, so if anything goes wrong, misjudgements could lead to devastating consequences.
Taiwan’s military must be responsible and maintain strict discipline. Incidents such as this must not occur again. It is Taiwan’s duty to safeguard regional safety in the Asia-Pacific region.
Ernie Ko is vice executive director of Transparency International-Taiwan.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.