President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has decided that a national conference on judicial reform should be convened in October. Presidential Office Secretary-General Lin Bih-jaw (林碧炤) is to head the preparatory committee, which is also to have three deputy conveners and 15 members. Leaving aside the issue of whether this is the best composition for a committee, there are also questions about whether this is a good arrangement and whether October is the right time for such a conference.
Tsai is intent on bringing about judicial reform and on putting together a preparatory committee of ambitious people. This is a move in the right direction and it should be welcomed by the public.
However, the judiciary should be independent and the Judicial Yuan is not administered by the Presidential Office, although the Judicial Yuan president and vice president are nominated by the president and approved by the legislature.
The question is how the judiciary should be reformed, and how the reforms should be implemented. As such reform touches on judges’ jurisdictional rights, there are a few issues that not even the nation’s president can approach, let alone the Presidential Office secretary-general. This is why it is wrong to appoint Lin as convener of the preparatory committee.
The right way to go about judicial reform is to let the president initiate it and then pass the task on to the Judicial Yuan and the Ministry of Justice.
A national conference on judicial reform was convened from July 6 to July 8, 1999, during the administration of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝). The preparatory committee was made up of the secretary-general of the Judicial Yuan, the justice minister and vice justice minister, members of the Judges Association and the Taiwan Bar Association, as well as judges, prosecutors and academics — 11 people in all.
They addressed 12 issues, establishing the agenda rules for the judicial reform conference, the daily schedule for the conference and the status of the Judicial Yuan.
The preparatory committee met nine times, and in addition, it held an explanatory meeting. The judicial reform conference was attended by 125 people and was followed by the publication of a report on the conference. The report could be used as a reference when preparing the upcoming conference, as it could reduce uncertainty and improve the preparatory committee’s efficiency.
The president and vice president of the Judicial Yuan are stepping down in October, and it would be awkward to have the outgoing president and vice president participate in the preparatory work for the conference. After all, it is precisely because they failed to facilitate reform that the national reform conference is needed in the first place, so it would be an embarrassment for them to participate.
Furthermore, they are counting down their last days in office, so who would have the heart to tell them to participate in preparatory work? October is probably not the best time for the conference.
The proper way to go about this would be to wait until the next president and vice president of the Judicial Yuan have been nominated and approved. Rushing to hold the conference in October, before the new heads of Judicial Yuan have been appointed, would exclude them from the conference, and that could make it difficult to accomplish continuity and implement the conclusions reached at the conference, and the result could be that judicial reform fails.
Chuang Sheng-rong is a lawyer.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations