During its first meeting last week, the National Pension Reform Committee discussed its agenda rules. Although the decision on the proposed rules for the reform draft should in principle be consensual, it was decided that if necessary, a decision could be passed with a majority vote.
That contravenes the pledge made by the committee’s convener, Minister Without Portfolio Lin Wan-i (林萬億), and representatives of current and retired military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers who felt that such a decision would be tantamount to the tyranny of the majority left the meeting.
As a result, the focus of the next meeting is likely to be how to define a “consensus decision.”
A majority vote is a legitimate way of arriving at a decision reflecting the majority opinion, and it is also the best way of resolving procedural disputes. However, there is no legal basis for the pension reform committee as it is not stipulated by law. Functionally, it is either an arbitration or a consultative committee, but its status is unclear. A majority decision would only be required if it is an arbitration committee.
The representatives of current and retired military personnel, civil servants and teachers feel that the government is attempting to define the committee as an arbitration committee and use majority decisions to endorse government policy. If this is the case, there would be constant controversy, they feel.
If a compromise is reached and the committee is defined as an aid to allow society and experts to participate in government decisions, and if a consensus decision model is adopted and committee members are encouraged to propose suggestions, the committee’s meetings are likely to reach the expected policy goals.
“Consensus decision” means a decision reached through cooperation and is supported by all members. Although a decision reached in a consensus situation might not be the first choice of all participants, it is a decision that is acceptable to everyone.
The time to adopt a consensus decision is when a decision is very important or when it has far-reaching consequences, and when the exchange of opinions and viewpoints would be helpful to the group. This really should be the case with pension reform.
A committee allowing for the participation of civic society and experts in government decisions is a consultative committee that collects information or listens to opinions.
The method used is to first draft a policy proposal and to let committee members read and discuss the proposal in advance in order to be able to define the issues that are to be discussed within that subject area, and then confer with experts in a public forum. Finally, the committee members discuss controversial issues and come to a decision. Viewpoints, including views where no consensus exists, are highlighted in a report, and the final decisionmaker then has the final say over which views to accept and which to reject.
Trust is what drives all regular processes, and if the final decisionmaker’s impartiality is in question at the beginning of a meeting it would be difficult to establish justice even if a more detailed procedure is adopted to protect the rules.
Because pension reform is a controversial issue, it is recommended that the committee be defined as a consultative committee.
Following democratic participation and debate, advisory opinions must be made the focus of national attention, and the legislature, based on the need to reflect public opinion, should use these advisory opinions as an important reference as it creates new legislation.
Lo Chuan-hsien is an adjunct professor of law at Central Police University and a former director-general of the Legislative Yuan’s Legislative Bureau.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.