One night in August last year, as the Central African Republic was gripped by a conflict between Christian and Muslim groups, UN peacekeeping troops descended on an enclave in search of a suspect. One of the peacekeepers is accused of taking a 12-year-old girl behind a truck and raping her.
“When I cried, he slapped me hard and put his hand over my mouth,” the girl told Amnesty International.
It was hardly the only act of brutality by peacekeepers in the world’s poorest nations. There were 99 allegations of sexual abuse against UN staff last year, a 25 percent increase from 2014, affecting peacekeeping operations in nations such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo), Haiti, Ivory Coast, Libya, Mali and Sudan.
Illustration: Mountain people
Vulnerable civilians in armed conflict have long been victims of abusive soldiers. However, 104,000 blue-helmeted troops now deployed are sent by more than a dozen nations to protect people. Their repeated failures are looming over the UN as it chooses a new leader and tarnishing the legacy of UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who is ending his decade-long tenure amid accusations that he has not taken the issue seriously.
“For 10 years, the secretary-general has been happy to sweep all of these allegations under the carpet, but this ‘out of sight, out of mind’ strategy has broken down before he reached the end of his term,” former UN investigator Peter Gallo said. “The organization’s manifest failure is to properly investigate any form of wrongdoing.”
Ban’s office denies the accusations — the secretary-general was “shocked to the core” by the abuse, UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric said, adding that Ban has moved aggressively. In April, the UN announced an investigation of allegations that peacekeepers from at least three nations had abused more than 100 girls in the Central African Republic, where the World Bank said nearly half the population of about 5 million needs humanitarian aid.
However, damaging accounts keep surfacing, not only of abuse, but of failure to investigate and act. Internal UN documents, leaked by advocacy group, AIDS-Free World, include an episode in 2014 in which French troops were said to have forced four girls to perform obscene acts for a few US dollars.
Last week, Anders Kompass, a senior UN official who had tried to expose earlier sexual abuse of children by French and African troops, resigned in frustration.
Kompass said he was horrified by “the complete impunity for those who have been found to have, in various degrees, abused their authority.”
“This makes it impossible for me to continue working there,” he told IRIN news service.
US Republican Senator Bob Corker, who chairs the US House of Representatives’ Foreign Affairs Committee, called Kompass’ resignation “a damning indictment of the leadership at the United Nations that has failed to end the horrific sexual exploitation and abuse by peacekeepers, and protect those who report wrongdoing.”
Ban’s successor must make fixing the problem a high priority, said Richard Gowan, a fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations.
UN officials have been publicly interviewing more than a dozen potential successors to Ban, with a final selection expected in October. All have said they would work to end the mistreatment.
“There are too many stories of sexual abuse by peacekeepers and too little evidence of operations succeeding,” Gowan said. “The next secretary-general will need a plan both to clean up peacekeeping and give it a greater sense of strategic purpose.”
Peacekeeping dates from the origins of the UN, but has grown enormously. In 1948, the UN sent 50 guards to monitor the Israeli-Arab truce. Now, about 104,000 troops with access to attack helicopters and drones are deployed across Asia, Africa, the Caribbean and the Middle East. They are joined by an additional 16,500 civilian personnel. In the past 25 years, the budget has ballooned 16-fold to US$8.3 billion.
Sexual abuse by UN peacekeepers was first documented in Bosnia and Kosovo in the early 1990s. As the frequency has increased, so has impunity for the perpetrators, partly because responsibility for punishment falls to home nations. The UN can send troops home and document the reasons why, but it cannot impose criminal charges or jail offenders.
“The UN is famous as a place where rapists get away with rape,” Aids-Free World cofounder and director Paula Donovan said.
The latest scandals go back to 2013 when boys at a refugee camp in Bangui said they were ordered to perform oral sex and raped by peacekeepers from France, Chad and Equatorial Guinea. A UN official produced a report that was sent to the human rights office in Geneva as well as to the UN Children’s Emergency Fund. Neither took action.
Beatrice Edwards, executive director of advocacy group Government Accountability Project, said UN staff are reluctant to report sexual abuse for fear of losing their jobs.
Kompass, then-field operations director at the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, ultimately got fed up and leaked the buried report to French diplomats in Geneva, who sent investigators to Bangui.
The UN rewarded Kompass for his efforts by suspending him and starting a disciplinary investigation. Miranda Brown, who worked with Kompass, then passed the report to the US mission. Brown’s contract was not renewed, which she said was retaliation for her actions.
“The real problem is that the UN’s leadership are only accountable to themselves,” said Brown, who has testified at congressional hearings.
An external panel appointed last year by Ban issued a report in December last year that accused some UN officials of obstructing the investigation and focusing on punishing Kompass.
It said the child sexual abuse report went “from desk to desk, inbox to inbox.”
“The end result was a gross institutional failure to respond to the allegations in a meaningful way,” it said. “In the absence of concrete action to address wrongdoing by the very persons sent to protect vulnerable populations, the credibility of the UN and peacekeeping operations are in jeopardy.”
The problem is not getting better on its own, although a few steps have been taken. Ban appointed a special coordinator, Jane Holl Lute, a former deputy secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security. The UN Security Council has also authorized the peacekeeping office to send home troops whose nations fail to hold them accountable.
However, the grinding bureaucracy moves slowly.
“For the UN to be fixed, it requires political will from other countries beyond the US,” said Heritage Foundation researcher Brett Schaefer, who has long been critical of the international organization. “The key is persevering after the spotlight has gone.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations