Self-styled citizen reporter Hung Su-chu (洪素珠) used hateful language to insult elderly veterans by calling them “Chinese refugees,” shocking Taiwan. The leaders of the ruling and opposition parties immediately condemned her, showing that Taiwan’s maturity on the issue of ethnicity has grown, and that there is little room left for political manipulation of the issue.
However, there are still political forces trying to link ethnic hate speech to transitional justice.
For example, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) said: “I wonder whether the objective is to achieve transitional justice or to twist it,” while KMT Culture and Communications Committee director Chow Chi-wai (周志偉) said that the Democratic Progressive Party’s transitional justice plan was intended to cause ethnic hatred and is being used to promote tolerance of prejudice.
Such language makes it clear that some politicians are trying to turn society’s collective condemnation of ethnic hate speech into doubt over the possibility of transitional justice. The KMT is clearly using the issue to divert attention from the impending liquidation of its stolen assets.
Ethnic hate speech has always existed in Taiwan due to the island’s complicated history. In the past, the Han Chinese called Aborigines “savages.” During the Japanese colonial era, all Taiwanese were frequently referred to as “Qing slaves,” and when the KMT government took over Taiwan after World War II, bringing with it irregularities and corruption, Taiwanese complained that “the dogs [the Japanese] have been replaced by pigs [the Chinese].”
KMT officials could not get used to the Taiwanese following Japanese customs after having been ruled by the Japanese for decades, and said that they had developed a “slave mentality.”
The blood-drenched 228 Incident was a result of hatred.
History teaches us that ethnic hatred brings happiness to no one, but even after the first transition of power in 2000, people such as former Government Information Office employee Kuo Kuan-ying (郭冠英), who calls himself a “high-class Mainlander,” still exist in Taiwan.
In several articles published under his pseudonym, Fan Lan-chin (范蘭欽), Kuo wrote that former Taiwan provincial governor Chen Yi’s (陳儀) rule was benevolent and therefore gave the “Japanese pirates” a chance to rebel, a rebellion that led to the 228 Incident.
He also wrote that the KMT should learn from that lesson and never put down the gun, and that Taiwanese should be suppressed even if they submit to KMT rule. If Chinese Mainlanders were hurt, he wrote, they should crack down hard on “Japanese pirates.”
Both Kuo’s talk about “Japanese pirates” and Hung’s “Chinese refugees” are typical examples of hate speech. It now seems as if Taiwanese society, which is capable of improving itself, will sweep such hate speech into the dustbin of history.
The KMT is once again calling for an ethnic equality act, which was also suggested following Kuo’s articles in 2009. The Presidential Office responded that it would welcome such legislation, and President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has handled the incident wisely, by among other things sharing a post by Hung addressing the incident on Facebook.
The next step is to prevent all sides from using hate speech to stigmatize transitional justice and keep the initiative. Transitional justice is not about one ethnic group’s crackdown on another, nor is it a pursuit of old debts: The White Terror victims came from all ethnic groups, and the pursuit of justice goes beyond ethnicity.
Take for example the Yantai Joint High School incident in Penghu in 1949, when several hundred teachers and students from China’s Shandong Province were falsely accused of espionage. Or consider White Terror era victims such as the Tsou Aborigines Kao Yi-sheng (高一生) and Tang Shou-jen (湯守仁) who were executed for espionage.
Many political prisoners, such as the writer Bo Yang (柏楊), were jailed on Green Island, and many mothers cried themselves to sleep at night and died from grief.
These are all events that still must be addressed. Compared to this, the pursuit of the KMT’s inappropriately obtained assets is just the tip of the iceberg.
The core value of transitional justice is not about individuals or ethnic groups seeking revenge on other individuals or ethnic groups. It is a huge social project that attempts to make offenders pay the price by repenting and confessing to their crimes in order to finally gain society’s forgiveness.
If offenders continue to enjoy high positions and great wealth, and do not have to take responsibility for their actions, then how are we to stop such vicious actions from being repeated? We must not let the smoke caused by the ethnic hate issue cloud our determination to carry out transitional justice.
Eve Chiu is managing supervisor of the Association of Mainlander Taiwanese.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under