Political leaders and the public alike over the weekend demonstrated a high level of civic maturity and collective respect for differences by not hesitating to condemn self-styled citizen journalist Hung Su-chu (洪素珠), who on Thursday posted a video on Facebook showing her firing insults at an elderly waishengren (外省人, Mainlander) — people who fled to Taiwan with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) following its defeat in the Chinese Civil War.
As opinion leaders from various sectors denounced Hung’s hateful remarks and advocated inclusiveness among people of different ethnic backgrounds, the KMT, which had previously opposed legislation to promote ethnic equality, was quick to suggest that it would soon propose a bill against ethnic discrimination and “erase hatred among people of different ethnicities and family backgrounds.”
While the party’s call for efforts against hatred and discrimination deserves applause, as does KMT Chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu’s (洪秀柱) remarks that “Taiwan must not be further divided by hatred,” Hung, nonetheless, has some explaining to do after contradictory actions by ranking KMT officials.
Former KMT spokesperson Yang Wei-chung (楊偉中) on Sunday said on Facebook that the KMT headquarters plans to use the Hung Su-chu incident to “launch across-the-board political wrangles.”
KMT Central Policy Committee director Alex Tsai (蔡正元) yesterday readily admitted he issued such a directive to the party’s local chapters, saying he had not done anything wrong by asking local chapters to address the discriminatory remarks.
Flabbergasted would be a huge understatement in describing the astonishment many members of the public feel over Tsai’s shamelessness in exploiting the Hung Su-chu incident for political gain.
However, perhaps one ought not to be surprised by Tsai’s remarks, following his recent shock move to “share” a Sina Weibo article that said Taiwan must be ruled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to complete its “historic mission” of unification.
Tsai’s actions alone have dampened public confidence in the KMT’s supposed efforts to push for legislation promoting rationality, tolerance, respect and ethnic harmony.
As a result of Tsai’s abhorrent remarks and his sharing of a post that in essence welcomes a Chinese invasion, the public likely not only doubts the KMT’s sincerity in its call for a concerted effort to “make hatred and discriminatory words and deeds disappear from society,” but many more probably wonder whether the KMT, after losing the presidency and its majority in the legislature, harbors the attitude: “Now that we have lost power, we might as well give up all of Taiwan to the CCP.”
Hung Su-chu is, at most, a fanatic who, due to her ignorance and lack of respect and appreciation for people of different ethnic backgrounds, resorted to insults and stirring up ethnic tension, which has met with disapproval from the public.
However, Tsai’s provocative remarks and actions are a different matter, which makes them even more detestable, as he has attempted to incite ethnic division for political gain.
As head of the KMT, Hung Hsiu-chu owes the public an explanation.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under