After being abandoned as too ambitious in 1969, global plans to eliminate malaria are back on the agenda, with financial backing from the world’s richest couple, Bill and Melinda Gates, and US President Barack Obama.
The Gates aim to eradicate malaria by 2040 by doubling funding over the next decade to support the roll out of new products to tackle rising drug resistance against the disease.
Their goal of permanently ending transmission of the disease between humans and mosquitoes is more ambitious than the Sustainable Development Goal of ending epidemic levels of malaria by 2030.
They are also supporting a push to create the world’s first vaccine against a parasite.
Six innovations scientists are working on are:
■ New insecticides
Mosquitoes are becoming resistant to insecticides used to spray inside homes and in bed nets.
“There is no current insecticide that doesn’t show insect-resistance at the moment,” said Jed Stone, a spokesman for the UK-based Innovative Vector Control Consortium (IVCC).
Indoor spraying of walls with insecticide — which was used to wipe out malaria in the US in the 1940s — has fallen by 40 percent since 2012 due to resistance to older products and the high cost of newer ones.
The IVCC is developing three new insecticides for use in indoor sprays and bed nets that kill insecticide-resistant mosquitoes.
“The insecticides are virtually ready, but it will take about five years to finally develop them,” Stone said, adding that this largely involves registration with regulators.
■ A single-dose cure
A pill that would wipe out all parasites in the body could be available by 2019, the Gates Foundation said.
Human trials of one candidate are planned following successful tests on mice, published last year.
Existing drugs have to be taken for three days with the risk that people do not finish their medication, contributing to the development of drug-resistant malaria.
They also only kill parasites at the asexual-stage where they cause fever, but not at the sexual-stage where they are picked up by mosquitoes in blood.
■ Insecticide-treated wall liners
Scientists hope insecticide-treated wall liners, which look like wallpaper, will be more effective than spraying people’s homes with insecticide every three to eight months. The wall liners kill mosquitoes that rest on them and can last for three years.
Tanzania’s National Institute for Medical Research is testing wall liners in 6,000 homes to see if they protect people from malaria. Results will be published in next year.
■ Insecticide-embedded clothing
US soldiers have been wearing combat uniforms treated with permethrin, a synthetic insecticide, since 2010 to protect them against insect-borne diseases.
The US government’s Walter Reed Army Institute of Research will test the effectiveness of treated combat uniforms and repellent creams next month on Tanzanian soldiers who often catch malaria when working at night as peacekeepers.
■ A vaccine
This is a big one, given vaccines success in eliminating smallpox, polio and measles in many countries.
More than 30 malaria vaccines are under development.
The Mosquirix vaccine, discovered in 1987, is a decade ahead of other candidates, but, to date, it only halves the number of bouts of malaria young children suffer.
The WHO is seeking funding for a pilot program to administer Mosquirix to 400,000 to 800,000 African children. The results will be used to make a decision on whether to use the vaccine more widely.
■ GM mosquitoes
Scientists have genetically modified (GM) mosquitoes by adding genes that block the development of the malaria parasite inside the insect.
Scientists have also genetically modified mosquitoes to make them infertile, so that they die out, but many are cautious about the unforeseen consequences of this.
“When people imagine a malaria end-game scenario, GM mosquito technology would be incredibly powerful, because it doesn’t rely on a robust health system in order to go in and disrupt transmission of the parasite,” said Martin Edlund, chief executive of Malaria No More, referring to war-torn countries like South Sudan.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations