After being abandoned as too ambitious in 1969, global plans to eliminate malaria are back on the agenda, with financial backing from the world’s richest couple, Bill and Melinda Gates, and US President Barack Obama.
The Gates aim to eradicate malaria by 2040 by doubling funding over the next decade to support the roll out of new products to tackle rising drug resistance against the disease.
Their goal of permanently ending transmission of the disease between humans and mosquitoes is more ambitious than the Sustainable Development Goal of ending epidemic levels of malaria by 2030.
They are also supporting a push to create the world’s first vaccine against a parasite.
Six innovations scientists are working on are:
■ New insecticides
Mosquitoes are becoming resistant to insecticides used to spray inside homes and in bed nets.
“There is no current insecticide that doesn’t show insect-resistance at the moment,” said Jed Stone, a spokesman for the UK-based Innovative Vector Control Consortium (IVCC).
Indoor spraying of walls with insecticide — which was used to wipe out malaria in the US in the 1940s — has fallen by 40 percent since 2012 due to resistance to older products and the high cost of newer ones.
The IVCC is developing three new insecticides for use in indoor sprays and bed nets that kill insecticide-resistant mosquitoes.
“The insecticides are virtually ready, but it will take about five years to finally develop them,” Stone said, adding that this largely involves registration with regulators.
■ A single-dose cure
A pill that would wipe out all parasites in the body could be available by 2019, the Gates Foundation said.
Human trials of one candidate are planned following successful tests on mice, published last year.
Existing drugs have to be taken for three days with the risk that people do not finish their medication, contributing to the development of drug-resistant malaria.
They also only kill parasites at the asexual-stage where they cause fever, but not at the sexual-stage where they are picked up by mosquitoes in blood.
■ Insecticide-treated wall liners
Scientists hope insecticide-treated wall liners, which look like wallpaper, will be more effective than spraying people’s homes with insecticide every three to eight months. The wall liners kill mosquitoes that rest on them and can last for three years.
Tanzania’s National Institute for Medical Research is testing wall liners in 6,000 homes to see if they protect people from malaria. Results will be published in next year.
■ Insecticide-embedded clothing
US soldiers have been wearing combat uniforms treated with permethrin, a synthetic insecticide, since 2010 to protect them against insect-borne diseases.
The US government’s Walter Reed Army Institute of Research will test the effectiveness of treated combat uniforms and repellent creams next month on Tanzanian soldiers who often catch malaria when working at night as peacekeepers.
■ A vaccine
This is a big one, given vaccines success in eliminating smallpox, polio and measles in many countries.
More than 30 malaria vaccines are under development.
The Mosquirix vaccine, discovered in 1987, is a decade ahead of other candidates, but, to date, it only halves the number of bouts of malaria young children suffer.
The WHO is seeking funding for a pilot program to administer Mosquirix to 400,000 to 800,000 African children. The results will be used to make a decision on whether to use the vaccine more widely.
■ GM mosquitoes
Scientists have genetically modified (GM) mosquitoes by adding genes that block the development of the malaria parasite inside the insect.
Scientists have also genetically modified mosquitoes to make them infertile, so that they die out, but many are cautious about the unforeseen consequences of this.
“When people imagine a malaria end-game scenario, GM mosquito technology would be incredibly powerful, because it doesn’t rely on a robust health system in order to go in and disrupt transmission of the parasite,” said Martin Edlund, chief executive of Malaria No More, referring to war-torn countries like South Sudan.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry