On Thursday last week, heavy rain caused severe flooding at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport, leading to tens of thousands of stranded passengers bereft of light, electricity and air-conditioning, and not knowing when flights would resume. The central and local government, as well as Taoyuan International Airport Corp (TIAC), were at a loss as to what to do, pointing the finger of blame at each other. It was as if they were hoping that the problem would just go away if they ignored it long enough.
It was not the first time flooding had occurred at Taoyuan airport. It is fine if airport authorities decide to close the airport temporarily as an emergency measure at times of heavy rain to prevent the situation from becoming more serious. It has happened in other countries, too.
Notodden Airport in Norway was recently closed when rains caused flooding on the runway, and affected the connecting highway and bridges: It was closed twice in as many weeks. Then there was Boston Logan International Airport, which had to be closed twice between September last year and April. There is nothing shameful about closing an airport when heavy weather or natural disasters threaten to disrupt services or potentially put lives at risk. That said, there are few cases of international airports shutting down because the drainage system could not cope with a bit of rain — and those occurred in less-developed countries.
Initially, people suspected the culprit was the airport’s inadequate,1980s-designed drainage system. However, a Ministry of Transportation and Communications investigation revealed that the problem was caused by sediment blocking a pipe, causing floodwaters to flow back into the airport. This has nothing to do with the design of the drainage system: It is human error, based on negligence, pure and simple. The ministry accordingly replaced TIAC’s chairman and president, in what was the first step in introducing some much-needed changes.
There are also structural problems. The airport has definitely seen better days and is continuously plagued by leaks, partial flooding and delayed runway maintenance.
Many of these problems have been due to public construction projects long kept on the back burner, budgets perennially promised, but rarely forthcoming, and substandard construction work. Complicating matters is TIAC’s tendency to give out positions as rewards: management is often ill-suited and ill-prepared for the job, and often does not take the task seriously. Inadequate management has only exacerbated the problems at the airport.
Structural and personnel issues aside, there are also issues with the disaster response task force TIAC has set up to deal with natural or manmade disasters, such as typhoons, fires, flooding, dangerous substances, radiation, biological pathogens, earthquakes, tsunamis, hijackings, explosive devices or crashes, in compliance with the Disaster Prevention and Protection Act (災害防救法). This task force has drawn up emergency response procedures for disasters and emergencies of all descriptions and, while this all sounds impressive, the reality is far less so. The task force is not fit for the purpose, there is little disaster response preparedness to speak of and communication with the outside world is wanting. All in all, the airport is unable to cope with disasters or emergencies.
In any crisis there is opportunity. This could be a turning point. The government needs to think carefully about how to reform the personnel issues, re-examine the importance and prioritization of various construction projects, and vet contractors to make sure they are up to snuff. It also needs to ensure that systems and regulations are complied with, and drill emergency response measures to cope with various eventualities. Only when it has ironed out all of these details will the prospects of Taoyuan airport improve.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with