Wed, Jun 08, 2016 - Page 8 News List

EDITORIAL: Turning point for Taoyuan airport

On Thursday last week, heavy rain caused severe flooding at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport, leading to tens of thousands of stranded passengers bereft of light, electricity and air-conditioning, and not knowing when flights would resume. The central and local government, as well as Taoyuan International Airport Corp (TIAC), were at a loss as to what to do, pointing the finger of blame at each other. It was as if they were hoping that the problem would just go away if they ignored it long enough.

It was not the first time flooding had occurred at Taoyuan airport. It is fine if airport authorities decide to close the airport temporarily as an emergency measure at times of heavy rain to prevent the situation from becoming more serious. It has happened in other countries, too.

Notodden Airport in Norway was recently closed when rains caused flooding on the runway, and affected the connecting highway and bridges: It was closed twice in as many weeks. Then there was Boston Logan International Airport, which had to be closed twice between September last year and April. There is nothing shameful about closing an airport when heavy weather or natural disasters threaten to disrupt services or potentially put lives at risk. That said, there are few cases of international airports shutting down because the drainage system could not cope with a bit of rain — and those occurred in less-developed countries.

Initially, people suspected the culprit was the airport’s inadequate,1980s-designed drainage system. However, a Ministry of Transportation and Communications investigation revealed that the problem was caused by sediment blocking a pipe, causing floodwaters to flow back into the airport. This has nothing to do with the design of the drainage system: It is human error, based on negligence, pure and simple. The ministry accordingly replaced TIAC’s chairman and president, in what was the first step in introducing some much-needed changes.

There are also structural problems. The airport has definitely seen better days and is continuously plagued by leaks, partial flooding and delayed runway maintenance.

Many of these problems have been due to public construction projects long kept on the back burner, budgets perennially promised, but rarely forthcoming, and substandard construction work. Complicating matters is TIAC’s tendency to give out positions as rewards: management is often ill-suited and ill-prepared for the job, and often does not take the task seriously. Inadequate management has only exacerbated the problems at the airport.

Structural and personnel issues aside, there are also issues with the disaster response task force TIAC has set up to deal with natural or manmade disasters, such as typhoons, fires, flooding, dangerous substances, radiation, biological pathogens, earthquakes, tsunamis, hijackings, explosive devices or crashes, in compliance with the Disaster Prevention and Protection Act (災害防救法). This task force has drawn up emergency response procedures for disasters and emergencies of all descriptions and, while this all sounds impressive, the reality is far less so. The task force is not fit for the purpose, there is little disaster response preparedness to speak of and communication with the outside world is wanting. All in all, the airport is unable to cope with disasters or emergencies.

This story has been viewed 3698 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top