In recent months, various prominent public figures, including at least one close associate of Russian President Vladimir Putin, have insisted that Russia officially proclaim former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev a criminal for abetting the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Some regularly demand that Gorbachev be put on trial for the events, not least, as one member of parliament put it, to expose the operations of a “fifth column” within Russia.
Yet when the organizers of Gorbachev’s 85th birthday extravaganza in March approached the landmark Hotel Ukraine about a banquet, its owners refused payment after they learned that it was the former leader being honored.
“They said that without Gorbachev they would have ended up as small merchants in the market, criminals dealing in contraband,” said Alexei Venediktov, a close friend and the editor-in-chief of the radio station Echo of Moscow, the main news outlet for liberal Russians.
“They said: ‘Now we are the owners of all this thanks to Gorbachev. Not a kopeck.’” he said.
In an interview, Gorbachev shrugged off the fact that 25 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, he remains among the most reviled men in Russia.
“It is freedom of expression,” he said.
Yet the official line denigrating traditional democracy, combined with the very idea that he should face trial, obviously irks him, so he churns out articles, essays and books about the need to enhance freedom in Russia.
His latest effort, called The New Russia in English, was released in the US late last month.
There is also great admiration for him among Russians too, of course. Some adore him for introducing perestroika, or restructuring, combined with glasnost, or openness, which together helped to jettison the worst repressions of the communist system. Gorbachev led the way, albeit haltingly, toward free speech, free enterprise and open borders.
“Some love him for bringing freedom and others loathe him for bringing freedom,” said Dmitri Muratov, the editor of Novaya Gazeta, one of the few remaining independent newspapers and one in which Gorbachev holds a 10 percent stake.
The society at large blames him for losing the Soviet empire and leaving them citizens of a second-class country, even if individuals recognize that he opened new horizons for them and their children.
“The society does not like him; he is the anti-Putin,” Venediktov said. “Putin is the constructor and he is the deconstructor.”
He called that perception unfair.
In the interview, Gorbachev said: “I keep saying that Russia needs more democracy.”
The hour-long interview took place at his shrinking foundation, where his office is dominated by an oil painting of his wife, Raisa, who died of leukemia in 1999.
“We hear, even from people close to Putin, statements that emphasize authoritarianism, that emphasize decisiveness and that suggest that democracy can only be achieved far into the future,” Gorbachev said. “I think if democracy is firmly rooted, if it is based on elections, if people have the chance to elect leaders at regular intervals, I think that is what we need. That is the basis for stability in foreign and domestic policy.”
In his twilight years, Gorbachev has become an isolated figure. Most of his contemporaries are dead. He is just critical enough about the lack of democracy under Putin that state-run television channels avoid him. His death has been announced more than once.
Gorbachev does not fault Putin directly for the lack of democracy in Russia, although he was more critical of the president when his book was released last year.
“He began suffering from the same disease from which I used to suffer: self-assuredness,” Gorbachev said at the time. “He considers himself deputy-God, I do not know for what matters, though.”
He and others listed several reasons for muting his criticism.
First, Gorbachev enjoys no immunity from prosecution and hence like many government critics, feels increasingly uneasy as the Kremlin chips away at civil liberties.
He said he feared being declared a “foreign agent,” a revived Stalinist label that basically means “spy,” and that is now being used to shutter dozens of civil society organizations.
“There are quite a few reactionary people in this country who are already declaring me a foreign agent — they think that I am working for someone,” he said.
It is quite a statement from a man, who if he had changed nothing, might still be the supreme leader of the Soviet Union, as previous leaders tended to rule for life.
Second, he casts most of the political and economic ills plaguing Russia as the legacy of his hated archrival, former Russian president Boris Yeltsin, giving Putin a pass as a necessary correction.
Third, he agrees with Putin on many issues, particularly foreign policy. He supported Moscow grabbing back Crimea, for example, calling the public referendum legitimate — despite its being held at gunpoint. That stance just got him barred from Ukraine for five years.
As the man most responsible for ending the Cold War, Gorbachev feels betrayed that the West — and the US, in particular — played the victor and treated Russia like a dismissed serf, bringing NATO forces and the EU to its very borders.
“There was a mood of triumphalism at the end of the Cold War that was shared by many Americans,” he said. “That was the point of departure for the collapse of everything.”
However, he parts company with Putin on domestic issues, even if he keeps Yeltsin in the foreground.
Gorbachev and Yeltsin were longtime rivals who delighted in humiliating each other. Gorbachev gives grudging respect to Yeltsin for intervening to stop the coup that sought to overthrow his presidency in 1991, but low marks for the rest of his chaotic tenure, which gave democracy a bad name in Russia.
“I still do not understand why Yeltsin is regarded as a hero in the United States, when he was an authoritarian,” Gorbachev said in his most emotional display, slapping his hand on his desk.
Gorbachev travels little now, dividing his time between his office and a dacha outside Moscow. He calls the death of Raisa his “greatest loss.” He is heavier, and his famous birthmark is less prominent. Despite occasional hospital visits, he still downs vodka with friends.
Muratov said they often recounted the same joke, based on Gorbachev’s infamous campaign to lower alcohol consumption:
Two men are standing in a long, long vodka line prompted by the limited supply. One asks the other to keep his place in line, because he wants to go over to the Kremlin to punch Gorbachev in the face for his anti-alcohol policy. He comes back many hours later and his friend asks him if he had indeed punched Gorbachev. “No,” the man answered despondently. “The line at the Kremlin was even longer.”
Various people among the 300 guests at his birthday party offered toasts to Gorbachev. The ambassadors of the US, Germany, France and Israel all commended him separately for making the world a more peaceful, stable place.
One editor from Echo of Moscow radio, Sergei Buntman, gave an ironic toast saying that Gorbachev had wrecked everyone’s quiet existence.
Venediktov would be an esteemed schoolteacher instead of the controversial head of a popular radio station, Buntman said, while Putin would be a respected KGB lieutenant colonel rather than a target of critics worldwide.
“You ruined our lives,” the editor joked.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.