Taiwan, not Chinese Taipei
There is a saying in Taiwan: If you do not speak, no one will treat you as a fool, but when you speak improperly, you create a tonne of problems.
“Chinese Taipei” means the Chinese exile government in Taipei. It is exactly the same concept as the “one China” principle that WHO Director-General Margaret Chan (陳馮富珍) quoted in her invitation to former minister of health and welfare Chiang Been-huang (蔣丙煌) for the 69th World Health Assembly (WHA).
On Wednesday, Minister of Health and Welfare Lin Tzou-yien (林奏延), who attended the conference, called on the WHO and its member states to support the 23 million citizens of “Chinese Taipei” by facilitating their robust participation in WHA-related meetings and activities.
“Then no one will be left behind,” he said.
Lin’s five-minute speech mentioning “Chinese Taipei” without mentioning Taiwan at all not only fully endorsed Chan’s recalling of UN Resolution 2758 that saw Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) representatives expelled from the UN in 1971, but also voluntarily trapped 23 million Taiwanese into “one China” purgatory. What a shame.
Lin returned to Taipei and explained that his speech followed the instructions of the National Security Council and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Oh, that is even worse. It tells us the new Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government took Taiwan as part of the Republic of China (ROC) and accepted the ROC as an exiled Chinese government named “Chinese Taipei.”
Premier Lin Chuan (林全) said that it was “unsatisfactory, but acceptable.”
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that “no one should be left behind” was the crucial theme of this year’s WHA, which “reflects the necessity of our participation. Taiwan must never be absent from the global medical system.”
Yes, Taiwan must be part of the global system, but why did the DPP/ROC voluntarily call it “Chinese Taipei” without mentioning Taiwan?
The former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration accepted the “one China” principle, because they are a Chinese political party that has nothing to do with Taiwan. Now the DPP government has openly admitted that 23 million Taiwanese are of “Chinese Taipei,” automatically offering Taiwan as a part of China. This is untrue and unacceptable.
On Tuesday, the current and five former directors of the American Institute in Taiwan — Kin Moy, Christopher Marut, William Stanton, Stephen Young, Douglas Paal and Raymond Burghardt — jointly sent a clear message to encourage Taiwanese, saying: “We represent the American people. The democratic achievements of the people of Taiwan warrants our most sincere congratulations regarding the friendship between the US and Taiwan, which in the past few decades grew healthy and strong. Praise US-Taiwan relations.”
Taiwan is Taiwan, not Chinese Taipei. While Lin took to the podium and called Taiwan “Chinese Taipei,” it made no difference that we accused former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of insisting on the “1992 consensus with one China, respective interpretations” while meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
Tsai used to say an eight-second error could ruin eight years of credit; that is exactly right. Her government accepting the label of “Chinese Taipei” without protest is using up the credit won in the presidential election. Tsai’s honeymoon is over. From now on, Taiwanese have to open their eyes and ears and supervise how close the DPP/ROC will drive Taiwanese to China.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs