Currently, when it comes to food safety, most problems are attributed to insufficient inspections, and when those problems are tackled, most effort is spent on the improvement of testing and data analysis.
However, spending a lot of money and employing a great deal of manpower on testing will not provide a long-term solution, because the ingredients and problems of food and food additives are innumerable. It is next to impossible to test every ingredient. Attempting to do so would only waste national resources. An examination of the food safety incidents in recent years will reveal the following blind spots that arise when testing is the only guarantee of food safety.
First, food safety testing is limited to certain categories. Even if more categories are added, after a while they would become regular procedures; people would assume that as long as the procedures are followed, the food is safe to eat. However, that mentality could actually prevent people from discovering new problems. Moreover, problems such as ingredient spoilage and expiration can be difficult to discover during back-end testing.
Second, with every regulation, there are loopholes. However sophisticated testing technology becomes, it cannot prevent people from devising product formulas specifically to pass certain testing categories. For instance, tainted milk was produced with the addition of melamine to increase the nitrogen percentage in the milk and pass protein-related testing. Another example would be the tainted oil produced by Chang Chi Foodstuff Factory Co (大統長基), which devised a formula that contained a percentage of fatty acid in its tainted oil close to the percentage of fatty acid in untainted oil, thereby making it difficult for health authorities to produce evidence it was tainted, despite numerous tests.
Third, testing can serve as “health management” of food products, but it cannot reflect the quality and nutritional value that the products contain. Products such as peanut oil that contains peanut essence instead of real peanuts or milk that contains high percentages of maltodextrin mislead consumers into thinking that these products have the ingredients, nutrition and qualities that they should have.
Although such products are not necessarily hazardous to human health, they are mislabeled; consumers think that they are getting nutrition from these products, but they are only spending money on empty calories and additives.
Although it is necessary to perform testing, it is time-consuming. Hence it should be used supplementarily. Food safety should be addressed by managing its source: the ingredients. A comprehensive oversight mechanism from the farms to the table should be established.
“Honest labeling” should be thoroughly enforced. Complete and transparent product labeling means that food manufacturers would have to produce evidence of their product qualities, which facilitates oversight and enables consumers to make informed decisions that suit their needs.
Testing should be done by going right to the source, employing vertical testing from upstream to downstream. There do not have to be many samples, but it is necessary to actually visit upstream factories, cross-examining the data and information of the product producers and that of the ingredient suppliers.
By doing so, problems such as phantom factories and incongruities between data provided by suppliers and data recorded by manufacturers can be discovered. The source of problems can be found by following the trace to the very source. Afterward, similar products can also be examined to see if they have similar problems. Consequently, testing and inspection can be done more precisely and efficiently.
Sheu Hui-yu is director of the John Tung Foundation Food and Nutrition Center.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations