The Villa Poligono housing project, near the city of San Felix in Venezuela’s southeastern Bolivar state, is somewhere Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro might once have felt his popularity was secure.
His smiling, mustached image features prominently on a vast poster at the entrance to the complex of bungalows. Poligono is part of the socialist government’s Gran Mision Vivienda, the great housing mission designed to provide rent-free homes to those most in need, under the slogan “decent homes for the people.”
However, for the past few weeks few of its residents have been at home. Instead they can be found on the road outside, mounting a noisy protest.
Illustration: Mountain People
“We’ve had enough’, Anna Karena, 44, said. “This has to end.”
She has multiple grievances. Shockingly, none of the breezeblock homes in the entire complex has ever had running water. When the residents were given their keys in 2014, they were told that the plumbing would soon be connected. It never was. More recently, electricity blackouts, lasting four hours at a time, have become routine, as a combination of drought and inefficiency has left the nation without enough generating capacity.
However, what seems to have persuaded her and her neighbors to protest openly is the extreme scarcity of basics, such as rice, soap and medicine. Unable to afford the exorbitant prices of the rampant black market, Karena has to queue for hours, sometimes from before dawn, just to buy enough to eat.
Hers are the same allegations of government incompetence and corruption that are echoing across the nation. A crash in the global price of oil, by far Venezuela’s most significant export, has unmasked both its dysfunctional economy and a calamitous lack of foresight on the part of its leaders. It is grappling with the world’s deepest recession, the world’s highest inflation — estimated at about 500 percent — and the world’s second-highest murder rate. It has no sovereign wealth fund and is facing a serious risk of default by November.
“They have been telling us for years it’s about to get better,” Karena said, pointing to a field that the residents use as a public latrine.
“You want to know what happened to the money that they should have set aside for electricity and water?” said her neighbor, Yanileth. “They stole it.”
A handful of those in the small group on the road describe themselves as opposition supporters. Some claim that they are still Chavistas, loyal to Maduro’s predecessor, former Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez.
However, all said, without hesitation, that they want to see Maduro leave office.
And they have a firm, but possibly misplaced, belief that they have the power to make that happen.
Venezuela’s opposition, which won control of the national assembly following landslide elections in December last year, has begun the process of holding a recall referendum, hoping to cut short the president’s mandate, which is otherwise due to end in early 2019.
It is a cumbersome process. First, 1 percent of the electorate, in each of Venezuela’s 23 states, as well as the capital, Caracas, have to sign a petition saying they support a recall referendum. That is about 200,000 people. The opposition said it managed to gather 1.85 million signatures in a matter of days.
The signatures are now being “verified” by Venezuela’s electoral council (CNE). It is a supposedly independent institution, but is in fact a branch of government. The opposition accuses the CNE of deliberately stalling the referendum process and doing everything it can to protect its paymaster. It has organized three nationwide marches on its offices to demand an end to the delays.
The latest, on May 18, led to at least a dozen injuries and 26 arrests after security forces fired multiple rounds of teargas. At one stage, in an apparently unprovoked attack, a group of opposition supporters viciously beat up a police officer.
With the country seemingly in a deep downward spiral, Maduro, who blames the widespread shortages on a combination of the price of oil, foreign powers and capitalism, has decided that the solution is to give himself more power. He has unilaterally declared that the nation is in a state of emergency, ignoring that, according the constitution he claims to uphold, such a decision needs the approval of the national assembly.
The state of emergency gives him sweeping options to intervene in the private and public economy, including allowing the army to take over the distribution of food.
Maduro has also threatened to close down the national assembly, which he claims is full of “fascists.”
“It is a matter of time before it disappears,” Maduro said.
He described the referendum as “optional” only.
“We have no obligations to hold any type of referendum in this country,” he said, during a rare news conference with international journalists, the purported aim of which was to counter the bad press that he has been getting abroad.
Such statements have led to expressions of concern from many of Venezuela’s neighbors. Trinidad and Tobago, fearing a possible failed state on its doorstep, said that it is preparing for a “worst-case scenario.”
Organization of American States secretary-general Luis Almagro has told Maduro that if he blocks the recall referendum process, he will go down in history as just another of Latin America’s “petty dictators.”
Jose Mujica, the left-wing former president of Uruguay, seen as one of the region’s more philosophical leaders, went one stage further, describing Maduro as “mad as a goat.”
Some who know the 53-year-old president well have expressed surprise at his public intransigence and bullying demeanor. After beginning his career as a bus driver, Maduro worked his way up the ranks of the socialist political ladder as a union leader in the metro system and ultimately a foreign minister under Chavez. He might have done little beyond carrying out his boss’ orders. However, those who encountered him during that time say he did so with tact and charm.
In 2012, he was handpicked by the dying Chavez as his successor to take the so-called Bolivarian revolution forward.
The veteran Venezuelan politician, National Assembly President Henry Ramos Allup, a political opponent of Maduro, told the Observer that he remembers him as a young politician as “neither exceptional nor unexceptional. Normal.”
He said Maduro’s unusual manner might be a consequence of the stress of attempting to imitate Chavez’s autocratic style of leadership, while also having to share that power with others, including Minister of Defense Vladimir Padrino Lopez and former National Assembly president Diosdado Cabello.
The army has long been the arbiter of power in Venezuela, where there have been five coups, or coup attempts, since 1940.
Opposition leader Henrique Capriles said the time has come for the army to consider its position in the face of what he said was Maduro’s disregard for the constitution.
“You must decide whether you are with the constitution or Maduro,” he said.
It is unlikely that the army would consider deserting Maduro. Both Chavez, a former commando, and Maduro have been careful to ensure that the military is heavily embedded in the project of Chavismo, and its profits.
So is there any solution? International efforts are continuing to try to bring Venezuela’s government and opposition together in mediation talks.
Pope Francis has written a letter to Maduro, the contents of which have not been revealed.
However, a visit by his envoy scheduled for this week was canceled without explanation.
Former Spanish prime minister Jose Luis Zapatero, former Panamanian president Martin Torrijos and former Dominican Republic president Leonel Fernandez met Maduro earlier this month, as did senior opposition leaders. Progress appears to have been limited.
Luis Vicente Leon, a pollster in Caracas, takes a bleak view of the coming months.
Maduro’s government might have decided that the political cost of admitting that its previous policies were wrong would lead to its downfall, he said.
Its only option now is a more radical path, he said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry