As matadors face half-tonne bulls this month during Madrid’s most important annual series of bullfights and Pamplona gears up for its chaotic July bull runs down cobblestoned streets, tensions are building between anti-bullfighting forces and the tradition’s defenders, who have launched Spain’s first pro-bullfight lobbying group.
At least 17 Spanish cities and towns have slashed municipal funding for bullfights and bull runs or passed measures condemning or banning them since the leftist Podemos party won its first seats in local and regional elections a year ago.
Podemos finished third in an inconclusive national election in December last year, which splintered the nation’s traditional two-party system into four. It may be repeated on June 26, when Podemos could overtake the No. 2 center-left Socialists.
Illustration: Mountain People
Bull spectacles are expected to be banned this summer on the Mediterranean island of Mallorca by the regional Balearic Islands parliament ruled by a coalition including Podemos — six years after northeastern Catalonia prohibited bullfights, but enshrined as cultural heritage bull runs and events featuring bulls running around with flaming balls of wax or fireworks affixed to their horns.
Animal rights activists say the gory fights are among the planet’s most blatant forms of animal cruelty, with bulls lanced and finally stabbed through the heart. Matadors are praised for killing with a single stab, though some do not succeed in finishing off the animal with repeated thrusts. Foreign tourists attending fights for the first time often leave stunned.
“Now that the political scenery has changed, there is a window of opportunity at the local level to promote the anti-bullfighting agenda,” said Antonio Barroso, an analyst with the Teneo Intelligence political risk consulting firm. “The far-left has gained political power and this tends to be an issue leftist voters care about.”
However, the new Fighting Bull Foundation of breeders, matadors, ring workers, groups of aficionados with thousands of members and event organizers is pushing back with a prominent Madrid law firm that has filed five challenges so far this year to decisions against bullfighting by four Spanish municipal governments and one provincial administration.
It is also pressing for criminal charges in five municipalities against animal-rights protesters who disrupted bullfights, mostly by jumping into the rings. An appeal is planned for the Mallorca ban after its anticipated approval next month or in July. The foundation has also requested that Spain’s Constitutional Court act quickly on an appeal against the Catalonia ban filed in 2010.
Fighting Bull Foundation cofounder Juan Pedro Domecq, a famed breeder from a family renowned for producing wine, sherry and top-grade Spanish ham, said the bullfighting community had felt under attack with no one to defend it.
Besides the legal effort, the foundation is promoting bullfighting as an essential part of Mediterranean culture plus the economic benefits it generates in a nation with 20 percent unemployment.
“Now you are not going to be able to attack bullfighting for free,” Domecq said. “It will have consequences. Before the foundation existed, there were no consequences.”
Shouting matches often erupt between bullfight supporters and protesters at bull events. A May 2 confrontation captured on video in a small Catalonian town turned ugly when two animal-rights activists taking video were beaten up by three men and a woman.
The crowd cheered and applauded after one attacker grabbed an activist’s camera and hurled it into the bullring, shattering it.
The assailants were arrested, and the AnimaNaturalis animal rights group last week called for Catalan regional police to boost security to protect activists planning to video a weeklong bull event that began on Saturday last week.
“We think a minority of the pro-bull sector uses violence to defend their ideas,” AnimaNaturalis director Aida Gascon said. “But it’s very common for the hardcore fans to try to prevent us from recording.”
Jose Miguel Soriano, a partner with the Cremado & Calvo-Sotelo law firm representing the foundation, condemned the assault as “a repulsive act” by people “who don’t represent the bullfighting sector.”
Podemos leader Pablo Iglesias has said he would cut off government funding for bull spectacles, but would not ban bullfights. None of the leaders of Spain’s other three main political parties are against bullfights.
Leftist Madrid Mayor Manuela Carmena has said she will not ban bull events, but did eliminate a 61,000 euro (US$70,000) annual subsidy for the city’s only bullfighter school and ordered all bull promotional material taken off the city’s tourism Web site. She is not letting anyone use a 30-seat VIP section reserved for city officials and guests at the famed Las Ventas bullring, currently celebrating the weeks-long San Isidro round of bullfights.
Opponents of bull events say they are elated at the political momentum.
“Society has clearly said: ‘No to bullfights.’ It’s an unstoppable movement and it’s only a matter of time until we see bullfights disappear in our country,” said Silvia Barquero, president of Spain’s Pacma animal rights political party.
It did not win parliamentary seats in the most recent election, but boosted its vote to 220,369 from 102,114 in 2011 in the nation of 46 million.
While the activists hone in on bull events, the beasts roam free and virtually undisturbed at the 3,000-hectare western Spain farm of Victorino Martin, grazing in groups of four or five on verdant hills and napping in the shade of cork trees.
Those selected to fight leave for the ring when they are between four and five years old after a life of ease, said Martin, a legendary bull breeder who blames globalization “increasingly imposed by Anglo-Saxon culture” for the political fervor over bullfights.
“There’s an attempt to politicize the bulls, but the bulls have been the culture of the Spanish people for millennia,” Martin said.
Spain’s deep tradition with bullfights was named part of the nation’s cultural heritage in a law passed in 2013.
Martin says it is only fair for towns that regularly fund street parties that include live music and fireworks help pay for the featured bull events.
“We don’t want privileges; we just don’t like being discriminated against,” he said.
At a protest earlier this month of about 150 people against municipal financial support for bullfights in Madrid’s suburb of Fuenlabrada, Podemos member Luisa Barrios said some in her party do not think taking on bullfights should be a priority, but said she knows no party members who support them.
Bullfight fan Francisco Valero paused to watch the activists, covered in fake blood, put on a show. He supported their right to protest, but disagreed that the bulls are tortured.
“Fighting bulls were born to die in the ring,” Valero said. “This is Spanish culture.”
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
Taiwan’s rampant thesis and dissertation plagiarism has reduced the value of degrees, bringing the academic system’s public credibility to the brink of collapse. Data published on Retraction Watch — a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers — showed that 73 papers written by Taiwanese researchers were retracted from international journals between 2012 and 2016 due to fake peer reviews, the second-highest in the world behind China. Based on the size of the academic population, Taiwan was the highest in the world, making it academically a pirate nation. Academic fraud in Taiwan can be divided into several types: the listing of coauthors;