The recent discussions about whether to allow Apple Pay to operate in Taiwan have again drawn attention to mobile payment services. One year after the Legislative Yuan passed amendments to the Electronics Payment Processing Institutions Act (電子支付機構管理條例) — which offers a legal framework for third-party payment services — several online shopping portals and credit-card issuing banks have entered the market, while some mobile payment apps have become popular with consumers.
The Cabinet last week approved a proposal for the use of mobile payment services, like Apple Pay, with certain conditions — such as that mobile payment services should not be processed only by international payment networks such as Visa Inc and MasterCard Inc, and that a qualified token service provider (TSP) should be open for both domestic and foreign entities to help process payments.
The clearing and settlement of transactions with credit or debit cards issued domestically also have to be done in Taiwan.
The government is welcoming not only Apple Pay, but also Google Pay, Samsung Pay, Android Pay and similar mobile payment services. At the same time, the government is hoping these mobile payment providers will not just partner with Visa or MasterCard, but work with local non-credit-card firms, such as debit card, EasyCard and other third-party payment service platforms.
A token represents a unique digital identifier that allows payments to be processed without exposing actual account details that could be compromised. The government’s attitude is that mobile payment providers and international payment processing companies should help with the development of local TSPs, system interfaces and verification.
The central bank had earlier said it was concerned about Apple Pay’s service quality and security, as its TSP is operated by entities like Visa or MasterCard outside Taiwan.
Clearly, the government’s conditional approval for mobile payment services is aimed at protecting local players, since some domestic mobile payment companies said that granting approval to foreign platforms would hamper their development. However, in view of the increasing prevalence of online-to-offline transactions and rising mobile shopping, the government’s welcome to Apple Pay is more evidence of the nation’s changing mindset toward the so-called “Bank 3.0” era, following a slew of relaxed policies regarding online banking, third-party payment and other financial-technology-related services in recent years.
Taiwan’s payment ecosystem is unfriendly and lags far behind that of China — led by Alipay — and the US, home to PayPal. That partially helps explain why the nation’s online retail penetration reached 6.2 percent last year, far lower than South Korea’s 14.7 percent, China’s 11.4 percent and the US’ 7.3 percent, according to statistics from the Ministry of Economic Affairs and market researcher Euromonitor International.
Mobile payment services would help increase non-cash payment penetration, and the introduction of Apple Pay is likely to lead the trend to reshape the payment ecosystem in Taiwan and change the payment behavior of consumers.
In the long term, a more market-oriented, user-friendly digital payment policy — either mobile payment or third-party payment — should benefit the development of Taiwan’s Internet environment and e-commerce.
However, whether Apple Pay or other mobile payment services can finally launch in this nation depends on their ability to localize their services with a concrete infrastructure. Issues of data security and storage, as well as tax evasion and the “black” economy, are also key to final regulatory approval. As the nation heads into the Bank 3.0 era, the government’s priority, quite rightly, is to protect consumers while making sure businesses can operate.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with