Taiwan needs comprehensive constitutional reform and yet the nation seems incapable of even achieving something as simple as lowering the minimum voting age. Those in favor of reform might want to think about this: Given the myriad restrictions in our current politics, how are we to get past the political sound bites and academic prevarications and begin these reforms as soon as is possible? This is the million-dollar question in what might be termed the “politics of constitutional reform.”
The Civil Movement for Constitutional Reform, after much discussion and debate, has proposed one solution, in the form of draft legislation on the procedure for civic participation in constitutional reform.
This draft seeks to extend civic participation in the process of constitutional reform — especially in the initial stages — and to strengthen democratic deliberation, or the idea of reflection and choice that US founding father Alexander Hamilton spoke of in his 1787 essay Federalist No. 1.
In practical terms, we are very confident that this proposed legislation would enable, over the next four years and via referendums held on the same days as the general elections in 2018 and 2020, the completion of at least parts of the major reforms needed, such as reform of the constitutional amendments process, the electoral system and the constitutional government system. It would also strengthen the nation’s experience, vision and competency in this grand project of constitutional government.
Without first reforming and supplementing the current inadequate procedures and overturning the old politics, the nongovernmental organizations and political parties advocating constitutional reform would not be able to achieve reform, no matter how hard they try.
Last year’s failure to bring about constitutional reform remains fresh in our minds. This attempt to rewrite the rules of the game is more than a shift in policy, it is a shift from broken politics to “good politics.”
It might well be easier to get constitutional reform onto the legislative agenda, now that a new party enjoys a majority in the legislature. However, the endeavor still faces three challenges.
First, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) still controls enough legislative seats to veto a motion for constitutional reform, and it might still oppose such a motion because of emotional reasons and/or out of its own interests.
Second, even if both parties get behind constitutional reform, they might still differ greatly on the specifics of what that might actually look like.
Third, geopolitical considerations, especially pressure from China and the US, will — at least in part — curtail the direction and choices Taiwan has concerning a constitutional reform.
The proposed legislation — and its drafting and implementation — would undoubtedly go some way to overcoming these difficulties. In strengthening citizens’ participation in reasoned debate, pragmatic, self-interested political parties would be less likely to presume to object to reform for objection’s sake, as to do so would see them punished in the polls.
Even if public debate is unable to dissipate major differences — such as on the Cabinet system versus the presidential system — it would at least allow us to establish common ground and put differences aside for the time being. A legislative schedule is more concrete than voiced intentions and the actual procedure can be more democratic and rigorous.
Also, the process could mitigate our allies’ concerns about constitutional reform, which would also help us attain international recognition and support for the process. In addition, the establishment of a civil constitutional government conference would ensure that sufficient resources — especially the valuable commodity of time — are invested into constitutional reform.
The design of a political system allows room for debate and revision, but the politicians engaged in striving for a new constitution cannot, and should not, falter on the way to the good politics of constitutional reform.
It is of paramount importance that procedural legislation is passed first, and this would make constitutional reforms that Taiwan so sorely needs, a possibility.
Su Yen-tu is an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institutum Iurisprudentiae.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and