Following 25 years of strong economic development after the end of World War II, Japan and Germany encountered difficulties in the 1970s as they transitioned from old economies into new ones, much in the same way that Taiwan did in the 1990s.
Japan and Germany at that time launched programs to upgrade their industrial structures and revamp their industrial landscapes with the help of large-scale domestic-industrial strategic alliances. As a consequence, the yen went from an exchange rate of ¥300 to the US dollar 45 years ago to its current level. A similar thing happened in Germany.
The primary tactic of “strategic alliances” in Germany and Japan was not to lower production costs, but to capitalize on the industrial advantages that each country already had, thereby consolidating resources, researching and developing innovative products, employing “team play” strategies and taking control of the global market. As a result, the fruits of economic growth were shared by their people and economic growth was assured.
The critical period of Taiwan’s transition from an old economy to a new one happened 25 years ago, when then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was in office. Unfortunately, his successors, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), did not follow through with Lee’s “no haste, be patient” policy. Instead, they rushed the industrial sector into expansions westward and southward, with cheap production costs as the primary goal.
They did not realize that before they could expand anywhere, the most important thing was development at home. In other words, they should have established a Taiwanese industrial strategic alliance. Consequently, over the past 16 years, the economic benefits have been reaped by the business owners. There was no cooperation between industries. The result was that the economy declined and it is gloomy everywhere.
The key to the economic successes of Japan and Germany was that the leaders of their industrial strategic alliances and industry associations were extremely patriotic and had comprehensive leadership skills. In addition, both countries’ governmental agencies understood the advantages and weaknesses of their industries, which allowed them to formulate reasonable industrial policies.
For instance, before introducing an environmentally friendly standard or labor act, they laid out five stages for its completion, each of which took five years to achieve, so in total it took 25 years to bring the policies to fruition. They took a step-by-step approach so that industries could gradually improve their financial and infrastructure readiness, instead of having to rush to meet all their targets at once and falling miserably by the wayside.
The majority of Taiwanese industry associations spent the past 16 years doing business across the Taiwan Strait and even used public resources to expand personal business territories in China. Most of these people were opportunists, who did not seem to be able to distinguish friend from foe.
In such circumstances, it was almost impossible to form a strategic alliance. Meanwhile, the head of the nation was completely oblivious to what was going on. Chen and Ma said several times that they would seek advice from Taiwanese businesspeople, but the businesspeople that they sought advice from were not those whose earnings were the foundation of the nation’s tax revenues, whose businesses stayed in Taiwan to improve Taiwanese industries and whose profits were paid to a great many workers in this nation.
They did not seek advice from “real Taiwanese businesspeople.” Instead, they listened to those whose profits were stashed in Panama and whose companies operated in China. These businesspeople only returned to Taiwan when they got sick and needed Taiwanese medical care. Some of them were even willing to act as China’s advocates, and proudly so.
After eight years of Chen’s presidency and eight years of Ma’s presidency, Taiwan could not help but decline. President-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) is going to have a hard time reversing the nation’s downward spiral.
Fortunately, Taiwan is still alive. Chinese cannot figure out how Taiwan could survive after so much Taiwanese capital flowed to China and never returned.
What Taiwan had and still has is its good-natured hardworking people, who take what God has given them and make the best use of it, who appreciate the essence of democracy and who love the land underneath their feet with all their hearts and souls. This is the capital that would enable Tsai to run the nation.
I beseech you, Ms President, to be a watchful guardian, to separate the wheat from the chaff, to devise a comprehensive strategic alliance plan for each industry, to mark a turning point for Taiwan’s research and development as well as marketing, and rebuild Taiwan’s economic strength.
Jesse Liau is the president of Jes Uni Limited.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry