Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her government, the Bangladesh Awami League, is under growing pressure to end an apparent culture of impunity after a series of brutal murders of secular writers, bloggers and liberal intellectuals by radical Muslims.
A torrent of protest followed the latest killings on Monday night of Xulhaz Mannan, editor of the country’s only lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender magazine, and Mahbub Rabbi Tonoy, an actor and fellow gay rights activist. Critics have accused the government of failing to act effectively to stop the carnage.
“It is shocking that no one has been held to account for these horrific attacks and that almost no protection has been given to threatened members of civil society,” said Amnesty International’s Champa Patel, reacting to the four killings so far this month.
US Secretary of State John Kerry echoed the criticism, along with other western leaders. Similar protests by Bangladeshi free speech activists and well-known foreign writers have had little discernible effect in the past.
Since 2013, attacks characterized by the assailants’ use of machetes and cleavers have claimed the lives of secular bloggers, authors, journalists, academics and teachers of a supposedly liberal bent. The common denominator is the offense their views supposedly cause to hardline Muslims among Bangladesh’s mostly moderate and tolerant Sunni Muslim majority.
Westerners in general have also been randomly targeted in the past 12 months, as have members of Bangladesh’s Shiite and Ahmadi Muslim minorities, Hindus and Christian converts.
The geographical spread is expanding, too. Whereas attacks were initially mostly confined to highly observant rural areas, the murder of Mannan and his friend took place in the heart of the capital, Dhaka.
The official response has been seen as largely inadequate. Seven men were convicted last year of a 2013 attack, but most of the murders have gone unsolved and unpunished. This might be in part because Bangladesh is a poor country with a badly resourced police force.
Government curbs on media, television and social media have been blamed for a lack of scrutiny of the growth of religious extremism and of the meek official response. At the same time, the spread of jihadi ideology is linked to the increased use of social media in Bangladesh.
However, such factors aside, Hasina and the Awami League stand accused of a lack of political will, and more broadly, of risking the collapse of Bangladesh’s secular, post-independence democratic tradition by marginalizing the main opposition party, the Bangladesh Nationalist party (BNP), and over-controlling the national political discourse.
POLARIZATION
In typically uncompromising fashion, Hasina bluntly blamed the BNP and its Muslim political ally, the Jamaat-e-Islami (JEI) party, for the latest deaths.
“The BNP-Jamaat nexus has been engaged in such secret and heinous murders in various forms to destabilize the country... Such killings are being staged in a planned way,” Hasina said.
The government flatly denies international militant groups, such as the Islamic State and al-Qaeda are active in the country, despite mounting evidence to the contrary. It claims the killers belong to home-grown groups.
Contradicting official claims, the banned group Ansar al-Islam — the Bangladeshi branch of al-Qaeda on the Indian subcontinent — on Tuesday claimed responsibility for killing the two gay rights activists in what it called a “blessed attack.”
It said the two were killed because they were “pioneers of practicing and promoting homosexuality in Bangladesh” and were “working day and night to promote homosexuality ... with the help of their masters, the US crusaders and its Indian allies.”
Bangladeshi ministers have argued that a crackdown on militant groups could offend religious sensibilities and cause more problems than it would solve.
Interviewed by the Guardian last autumn, Hasina blamed Britain and unnamed Arab countries for tolerating the rise and global spread of radical Muslim ideas, and in some cases nurturing and funding hardline groups.
“The British government should take more steps on the ground. Jamaat has a strong influence in east London. That’s true; they are collecting money, they are sending money,” she said.
Bangladeshi opposition parties claim the government’s alleged exploitation of the country’s international crimes tribunal investigating mass killings at the time of Bangladesh’s 1971 war of liberation is fueling extremist violence.
The JEI backed Pakistan against the independence fighters led by Hasina’s father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, who was later murdered.
Several JEI leaders have been sentenced to death or to long prison terms since the tribunal process was launched by Hasina in 2009, to the fury of their hardline supporters.
Bangladesh’s overall inability to come to grips with extremism is in part the result of a fractured political space, where legitimate criticism and debate are increasingly restricted, analysts in Dhaka said.
The Awami League’s dominance, coupled with grinding poverty, ongoing human rights abuses and an ineffective, divided opposition, is causing growing polarization and political stagnation, and placing democracy at risk.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under