With less than a month left in President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) presidency, it is worth remembering that after the Jan. 16 presidential and legislative elections, Ma said he would work hard to satisfy the public’s needs until his final day as president.
However, as his term nears its end, Ma’s attention is riveted on securing a place for himself in history. Everything he has done — from his own remarks and actions to the measures taken by his administration — shows that he cares more about self-aggrandizement and pleasing Beijing than meeting the needs of the public.
This is further evidenced by an interview Ma did with the Singaporean newspaper Straits Times, which was published on Thursday last week.
In the interview, the president addresses a variety of subjects. Although he elaborated on several issues, the interview is fraught with intentional ambiguity and deliberate misunderstandings. Throughout the interview, Ma dodged questions or gave irrelevant answers. He also appeared self-congratulatory and allowed himself to diverge from the truth by misrepresenting Taiwanese mainstream public opinion, and at a certain point he even tried — unfairly — to speak for Beijing, which no national leader with a sense of dignity and integrity would do.
For anyone who wants to understand how Ma has become one of the nation’s most detested politicians, despite his extreme popularity eight years ago, this interview is a must-read.
When asked how his policies have benefited the public with regard to its top concern — the economy — Ma said that bringing about economic prosperity was one of his goals when running for president.
“We encountered three major economic downturns over the past eight years. So our economic growth was not as good as expected. Other nations are having a difficult time too. So despite the difficulties, we still try to forge ahead. In terms of international ranking, Taiwan has been doing quite well,” Ma said.
However, is that true?
Ma’s bragging might not stand up to scrutiny. According to a CIA report on last year’s global economic performance, out of 225 nations and territories, Taiwan ranked 136th with real GDP growth of 2.2 percent — placing it last among the “Four Asian Tigers” and behind India, the Philippines, Vietnam, as well as many other countries in the region.
And this is only in regard to Taiwan’s standing in the global economy, not to mention Ma’s laughable “6-3-3” campaign pledge — that he would boost annual economic growth to 6 percent, reduce the unemployment rate to 3 percent and increase the annual per capita income to US$30,000 — or that Taiwan’s economic growth has slowed down significantly since Ma replaced former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
What is unique about Ma is the way in which he so often teams up with Beijing at the expense of his compatriots — sometimes even trying to teach Taiwanese a lesson for not siding with China.
On the public outcry over Beijing’s attempts to exclude Taiwan from the international community, Ma said: “Of course, there are some disputes regarding how Beijing handles such problems.”
And when the interviewer mentioned that there are Taiwanese who support independence, Ma said: “I think you might have some misunderstanding regarding Taiwanese public opinion.”
He added that the pursuit of Taiwanese independence was to “take an irrational attitude toward China.”
On the other hand, he praised China for toning down its verbal threats and desisting from saber-rattling during the presidential election and for adopting other methods instead.
“We also see great progress from their side in showing respect for us,” Ma said, adding that: “China has started to show greater respect for a democratic society.”
As compliant as he is toward Beijing, Ma again defended the so-called “1992 consensus” — and did so awkwardly.
The “1992 consensus” is a term former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Su Chi (蘇起) admitted making up in 2000 when he was head of the Mainland Affairs Council. It refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and the Chinese government that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
According to Ma, the “1992 consensus” was proposed by the Taiwanese side and China accepted it later.
“If we do not even accept the things that we propose, then of course people would criticize our approach,” Ma said in the interview.
The term “1992 consensus,” made up by Su, has somehow turned into something “the public” wants. Who exactly is “the public”? People who were involved in the cross-strait negotiations in 1992 all confirmed that no consensus was reached at the time.
This is typical of Ma’s mentality. In the recent Kenya incident, what happened was that China broke its mutual legal assistance agreement with Taiwan and had Taiwanese fraud suspects deported to China without informing or negotiating with Taiwan.
Nonetheless, Ma insists that Taiwanese are wrong to think that the deportations had anything to do with Taiwan’s sovereignty. According to his reasoning, if Beijing were to undermine Taiwan’s sovereignty, it could simply take all cases into its own hands without negotiating with Taipei at all. How sweet and considerate Ma is toward China.
No wonder the interviewer asked him: “How do you feel about being more popular among mainlanders than among Taiwanese?”
The way people speak betrays their thoughts. Throughout the interview, Ma said more than once that “my term expires on May 19.” Ma seemed to feel a need to reiterate it. His repeated emphasis suggests his reluctance to lose power, as well as his desire to see his successor fail.
He said this exclusively when asked about threats from China and rising tensions across the Taiwan Strait. What Ma really meant was, let us wait and see what happens if the next president deviates from the “1992 consensus.”
Ma also showed the same attitude when answering several other important questions, such as: why Taiwanese are not happy with his cross-strait policies; why the presidential and legislative elections turned out to be a vote of no confidence for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT); whether the KMT is ready to reform itself; and how would he help the KMT?
None of these questions were really answered. Ma either gave a vague, broad answer, danced around the issue or simply ignored the question.
Self-complacency was another defining trait of Ma that the interview exposed.
His arrogant remarks include: “Actually a large number of Taiwanese support our approach [to cross-strait relations]; since I took office, the number of tourists to Kaohsiung increased five-fold; the reason that, starting from 2009, we could participate in the World Health Assembly was because during my term in office both sides of the Taiwan Strait reached a very important political foundation, which is the ‘1992 consensus’”
A political leader should receive compliments from other people, but Ma has been going around bragging about his “political achievements,” which is again typical of him.
The interview with the Singaporean newspaper has fully exposed Ma’s mentality. Seeing that, Taiwanese should no longer expect Ma to be graceful in his last days in office. Many Taiwanese can only hope that he stops causing problems and be a good caretaker.
Translated by Yu-an Tu
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations