What is poverty? For decades, we have defined it with a number, which the World Bank puts at a personal income of less than US$1.90 per day. However, a single number fails to capture the complexity of poverty. Measuring more than just income is essential to understanding the needs of poor people and delivering optimal assistance.
As the World Bank convenes its spring meetings in Washington next week, we have an opportunity to set benchmarks that include social and environmental dimensions of poverty.
The World Bank has acknowledged that more than income should be considered, and recently established a Commission on Global Poverty to recommend additional metrics.
Although many public and private groups already collect data on a range of issues affecting poor communities such as nutrition, maternal health, or access to education, such information remains largely untapped and is rarely shared across institutions.
However, there are some beacons of light, including the Social Progress Index, which provides a framework for tracking multiple symptoms of poverty across countries and complements traditional income-based measures.
When we rely on a single number to measure poverty, we misdiagnose the needs of poor people. In my home country, Paraguay, I work with one of the country’s largest social enterprises, Fundacion Paraguaya, to provide microfinance, education and training to thousands of our poorest citizens. We look at 50 metrics across six dimensions of poverty, including income, housing, education and infrastructure.
One of our clients, Dona Mercedes, is now a successful micro-entrepreneur from a rural community not far from the capital city of Asuncion. When she first started with Fundacion Paraguaya, she was sharing a single-bedroom home with 16 other family members and cooking meals on a small fire pit in the dirt floor. Now she has a cement floor, a brick house, a separate kitchen, and about US$500 in personal savings.
By using Fundacion Paraguaya’s self-evaluation on poverty, she was able to understand her own needs better and address them one at time. While traditional approaches focus largely on estimating the sources of household expenses and income, the Fundacion Paraguaya self-evaluation helped Mercedes break down her needs into 50 discrete areas that she could work on, piece by piece, and monitor over time.
For example, she self-evaluated the state of her bathroom and kitchen, the quality of the food eaten at home, the family’s dental health, the number of separate bedrooms in the house and even her self-esteem and decisionmaking capacity. A simple poverty map helps her track her progress by using the colors of the stoplight, red, yellow and green, and highlight her priority areas. Next, she plans to add two more bedrooms to her house and to work on enlarging her business.
Fundacion Paraguaya has been able to replicate this type of success in other parts of the world. In Tanzania, where I worked for three years in rural communities, we helped villages in the Southern Highlands adapt our poverty indicators to the local context to tackle water, sanitation and electrification needs. Similar efforts are being deployed in South Africa, Nigeria, Uganda, China and beyond.
We could make even more progress with public sector support. Fundacion Paraguaya collects rich data across multiple dimensions, tracking more than 8,700 families each year in Paraguay alone. If this information were to reach the government of Paraguay — which has its own methods for collecting data — we could identify pockets of poverty sooner and customize programs to help each family. Because the information is self-reported, this sort of collaboration could deliver targeted aid and highlight specific public services that are needed.
Moreover, if the World Bank’s Commission on Global Poverty adopts multidimensional poverty measures, it would spur other organizations to produce and share more detailed poverty data. That would give aid workers a more comprehensive poverty map of the world, helping to boost the effectiveness of anti-poverty efforts everywhere.
It would not be easy to choose which measures to include, or even how to set universal yardsticks; but even adopting a few basic ones would spur progress. For too long, one-dimensional measures such as the US$1.90 per day guideline have misdiagnosed poor people’s problems — and more importantly, their causes. We know that the US$1.90 per day benchmark does not fully capture the struggles of poor people in places such as Paraguay.
Fortunately, the World Bank now appears to recognize the limits of its income-based indicator. Ensuring that the right type of aid reaches those most in need in a timely and effective manner requires development policymakers to embrace the type of multidimensional poverty data that aid organizations like Fundacion Paraguaya have learned to gather.
Julia Corvalan is an Aspen New Voices fellow and strategy adviser for Fundacion Paraguaya, a social enterprise based in Paraguay, with expertise in the replication and adaptation of poverty elimination programs between Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa.Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under