Amid the controversy surrounding Taiwanese fraud suspects’ deportation from Kenya to China and calls from lawmakers to protect their rights, Minister of Justice Luo Ying-shay (羅瑩雪) said that criminals should not be protected. She might not be the only one who thinks that way, as most in the judiciary seem to consider themselves akin to the fictional Song Dynasty’s Justice Bao (包青天), an attitude which is keeping the nation from becoming a mature democracy governed by the rule of law with genuine protection of human rights.
Chinese police forcibly taking dozens of Taiwanese fraud suspects — who were acquitted by Kenyan courts — to Beijing caused an uproar in Taiwan, with the public and lawmakers demanding that the government “save” the suspects and have them tried in Taiwan to protect their rights, as they do not trust China’s judicial system.
The government came under fire for not defending the rights of Taiwanese despite a cross-strait agreement to fight crime and have judicial exchanges.
Luo responded to the criticism by saying: “It is not good to lose focus with ideas of democracy and human rights.”
“Should we protect criminals?” Luo said. “Human rights do not include committing crimes or the right to hurt others.”
Luo’s comments came as a shock to many.
It is true that no one has the right to hurt others, but as a minister of justice in a democratic nation, she should understand that every person — suspects and criminals included — should also enjoy the protection of their basic human rights.
Suspects should have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty and the right to defend themselves, and they should be granted legal assistance in court and a fair trial.
Luo should understand that such ideas do not amount to “losing focus”; rather, they should be the focus of a democracy and a society that adheres to the principles of human rights.
The first step for Taiwan to become a nation governed by the rule of law and a protector of human rights would be getting rid of the influence of Justice Bao — a fictional character based on a Chinese official, Bao Zheng (包拯), who lived more than 1,000 years ago and is praised as righteous and fair, and even worshiped as a “god of justice” in temples.
In fiction and dramatic works, Justice Bao is described as an all-knowing judge who could tell whether a suspect is lying, and would force the suspect to admit to the charges through torture, and would behead the most malicious criminals in court immediately after handing down verdicts.
Justice Bao was an admired figure in ancient China, when government officials were extremely corrupt and doled out punishments only to the disadvantaged.
TV series, movies and novels about Bao have been popular in Taiwan, with politicians and even judicial institutions often using his image to promote judicial reform.
However, in a modern democracy, people certainly do not need Justice Bao.
The image of Justice Bao being deeply rooted in the minds of judicial personnel and the public is not good for the nation, and could be a serious obstacle on Taiwan’s path toward becoming a modern democratic nation governed by the rule of law.
It is time for Luo, as well as many judges and prosecutors, to stop playing Justice Bao and realize that anyone can end up in court, so protecting the basic rights of suspects is not protecting “criminals,” but protecting innocent people — they might have learned it in their first class in law school, but they might need to be reminded that everyone should be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs