The Fisheries Agency is smelling a bit, well, fishy these days. Its lackluster reaction to repeated allegations — and proven cases — of shark finning in recent months are not only proving a major embarrassment, but have put Taiwanese fisheries exports to the EU at risk.
On Sept. 10 last year the agency was embarrassed by a Greenpeace announcement that a Taiwanese boat was found near Papua New Guinea with 75kg of shark fins and a dodgy catch logbook. Agency officials blustered about the environmental group’s breach of international law, but vowed to investigate the allegations of illegal finning.
On Oct. 1 last year, the European Commission issued a “yellow card” to Taiwan, giving it six months to resolve several issues: major shortcomings in its fisheries legal framework; inadequate sanctions that do not deter illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing; a lack of effective monitoring and control of Taiwan’s long-distance fleet; and a failure to comply with regional fisheries management organizations’ obligations. It warned that Taiwanese aquatic exports were at risk of being banned from EU markets.
The agency said that the commission’s decision “was beyond understanding,” but it vowed to work to resolve the problems.
A few days later the agency had to admit that its inspectors had boarded the ship Greenpeace had named and found a discrepancy between the ship’s catch and its log records, as well as 125 shark fins and five shark carcasses. It later suspended the boat’s license for two months for logbook discrepancies, three months for shark finning and another three months for taking a prohibited species, and fined the crew NT$150,000, the maximum allowed by law.
In early December last year, the agency was embarrassed yet again when Greenpeace reported that another Taiwanese vessel had been caught fishing illegally in Palau’s shark sanctuary.
Agency Director-General Sha Chih-yi (沙志一) said that his office was awaiting official reports from Palau, but the boat and crew would face punishment if the allegations were confirmed.
Then on Feb. 3 scores of frozen shark carcasses with their fins removed were discovered under a bridge in Hsinchu.
On Feb. 18, the agency called the incident “an isolated case,” saying that it was far-fetched to link it with illegal fishing and that the carcasses had probably been discarded by food processors, because the meat was no longer fresh.
On Thursday, Greenpeace Taiwan filleted the agency and served it up to the media.
A year-long probe of Taiwan’s tuna fishing sector and a secret investigation of Yilan and Pingtung county ports showed an industry that was “out of control,” with rampant shark finning and labor and human rights abuses, the group said.
It said it had uncovered 16 cases of shark finning in just one local port between August and October last year, compared with the 18 cases confirmed by the agency and the Coast Guard Administration for all of last year — highlighting the agency’s inability to monitor the industry.
The agency responded by saying that is has more than 100 officers who conduct random port inspections and that it would not tolerate illegal activities.
Taiwan in 2012 became the first Asian nation to ban shark finning, but the past few months have shown that the law — and the Fisheries Agency — lack the teeth needed to really eliminate the practice.
The Fisheries Agency claims that shark conservation and sustainable fishing are at the core of its mission. It is time that it lived up to its goals.
However, the Legislative Yuan must do its part as well, by passing amendments to Fisheries Act (漁業法) to raise the fines for illegal fishing and by ensuring that the agency has the finances and the personnel to effectively monitor the industry.
Over the past few years, migrant workers’ rights have improved in Taiwan, but there has not been a comparable improvement in protections for employers, who are faced with a range of challenges, such as family nurses mistreating patients or workers threatening to change brokers or demanding that employers change their jobs. Then there is the decrease in work standards. Migrant workers too often find the lure of the underground jobs market irresistible, are unaware of employment laws and regulations, or have found that National Immigration Agency (NIA) checks are lax, and as a result abscond. If this happens, what protections or
The World Health Assembly (WHA) held its annual meeting this week; Taiwan was still not represented. Its journalists were also barred from covering the online-only proceedings, despite the nation’s clearly demonstrated pandemic expertise that has set an example for the world. When the SARS epidemic reached Taiwan from southern China in 2003, dozens of lives were lost, but its health experts learned the importance of general testing, masks, technology to locate infected persons, swift decisions and quarantines. The lessons were applied immediately across Taiwan when COVID-19 arrived this year. From 2009 to 2016, Taiwan participated as an observer in the assembly under
The Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) has been giving daily COVID-19 updates for almost four months, and on several occasions when major developments have arisen, the news conferences have attracted large numbers of viewers. The entire nation is anxious about the pandemic, and interest in the latest news has become a part of daily life. Watching the center’s daily news conferences has become something of a national ritual. The pandemic has stabilized within Taiwan due to the admirable efforts of each person living in the nation conducting themselves with the utmost responsibility, and in certain cases making considerable sacrifices within their