Nine days before the Paris attacks, Islamic State (IS) leaders gathered in the Syrian town of Tabqa to talk about what was coming next for the extremist organization.
Senior officials from across the so-called Caliphate had made difficult journeys under constant fear of airstrikes to the small town west of Raqqa.
In what marked a critical phase in the group’s evolution, there was to be a new focus on exporting chaos to Europe, the assembled men were told. And up to 200 militants were in place across the continent ready to receive orders.
Details of the meeting have been relayed to the Guardian by two IS members who are familiar with what was discussed. Both said the mood in Tabqa that evening in early November last year was triumphant. Senior leaders said they were turning their focus to European capitals and had dispatched foreign fighters back to their homelands to prepare attack plans. And wait.
The move marked a decisive shift away from putting all the organization’s efforts into holding on to lands it had conquered in Syria and Iraq — a cause it acknowledged could not prevail against 14 different air forces and the omniscient eavesdropping powers of its foes.
Instead, the group now had the capacity to take the fight to the heart of its enemy. The means to do so had always been there through Europe’s porous borders, which had often facilitated the original journeys. However, the migrant route that had ferried hundreds of thousands of Syrians and Iraqis fleeing persecution had also allowed a small number of IS members to blend in, and head back the other way. In essence, IS had begun to prioritize controlling populations over geography. While it had not given up its grip on the large swath of Iraq and Syria it had seized at the expense of each sovereign state, the original area it controlled was now less important than the faraway societies it could influence.
IS’ spread was being consolidated in two ways. First, by the militant cells that had sworn allegiance to it and were gathering strength in such places as the Sinai in Egypt, Malaysia, Indonesia, Libya and Yemen. More important, though, in the context of the meeting, was the return home of the group’s own members, a small number of the estimated 25,000 fighters who had travelled to Iraq and Syria who were now the advance guard of the “next generation” of global extremism.
ATTACKS OF OPPORTUNITY
The men were to form classic sleeper cells and wait for orders. IS leaders saw opportunity wherever it might arise, but this new wave would place emphasis on wreaking havoc in Italy, Belgium, France, Germany and the UK.
“They said the UK was the hardest to get to,” one IS member said. “But Belgium was easy. Spain was also mentioned, but not as much as the rest.”
In the past six months, IS has lost about 30 percent of the area it controlled in the heady summer months of 2014. By the end of this year, it is likely to have lost significantly more than that.
Palmyra, one of its prized catches, is under imminent threat of recapture by a conglomerate of Russian, Iranian and Syrian forces. And Mosul, where the IS insurrection in Syria morphed into a phenomenon that imperiled the regional order, is under increasing threat from regrouping US-backed Iraqi forces.
They talked about which societies would crumble first. IS now contends that geography was a means to its ultimate ends, which were always to spread its influence far and wide. The group’s most senior leaders, among them the still recuperating IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, are implacably ideological, convinced of their role as custodians of an ultra-radical reading of Islamic teachings and compelled to fight anyone who does not submit to their worldview.
IS leaders believe that European societies are easily weakened through savagery. One of the IS members said the group’s senior officials had a deep understanding of the European political architecture and of the fears of its people.
“At the meeting, they talked about which societies would crumble first and what that would mean. They thought big attacks would lead to pressure on the EU and even NATO. This would be ideal for them,” he said.
In and around Tabqa, and into Iraq’s Anbar Province, the group is also focusing its efforts on controlling populations. Over the past two years, it has positioned itself as the de facto representative of the region’s Sunni Muslims — when a political process in Iraq and Syria has failed to do so.
IS messaging feeds heavily off a sense of disenfranchisement among Sunni communities who have lost power and influence over the past 13 years in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon.
Here too, physical geography matters less than dictating terms over population centers.
While the group is clearly on the back foot militarily in some corners of its “caliphate,” its strategic goals are now perhaps more in reach than ever before.
“They think a lot about this,” one of the IS members said. “They think they know you better than you know yourselves.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry