Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) announcement that the standoff between the city and Farglory Group over the construction of the Taipei Dome complex might have to be resolved by using the city’s “i-Voting” system has brought two problems to the fore: The lack of regulations overseeing the use of the online polling system and the independence of the Taipei Clean Government Committee — which Ko said gave this preposterous proposal the “green light.”
The issues that the city has asked the public to vote on using the online platform have all been related to the city government’s policy implementation.
There was the vote to gauge the public’s satisfaction with policies introduced by Taipei City Government agencies, the vote participated in by Shezidao (社子島) residents to produce a roadmap for the peninsula’s development, and the polls to determine which of the city’s 12 districts created the best lanterns for the Taipei Lantern Festival last month.
However, the fate of the Taipei Dome, a build-operate-transfer project, is not like these projects — over which the city has full jurisdiction. Therefore, the city does not have the mandate to put the issue to an “i-Vote.”
As Farglory Group has a contract with the city to build the Dome, leaving its fate in the public’s hands would not even be legal.
With most Taipei residents seeing Farglory as the villain in the Dome debacle, Ko is merely playing to the gallery by tapping into this antipathy, when he should be producing evidence of the alleged malpractices of his predecessors as he has pledged to do.
While the outcome of an online poll would likely favor the city government, it would not be legally binding, meaning that Farglory could just ignore it and the standoff would drag on.
This type of attempt to trump Farglory only calls into question Ko’s competence and costs him political capital.
Ko’s remark that the proposed poll was passed by a Clean Government Committee review was surprising, considering all the potential pitfalls it would present.
It is ironic that the committee — which the public had hoped would investigate the wrongdoing of former city government officials — has become a vehicle for Ko to manipulate public sentiment.
The committee is not the only city government agency that has apparently overstepped the bounds of its original remit: The Urban Planning Commission and the Cultural Assets Review Committee have got into hot water over the proposed relocation of the Mitsui Warehouse — built during the Japanese colonial era — which civic groups are fighting to protect.
Without a consensus having been reached among commission members, Taipei Deputy Mayor Charles Lin (林欽榮), who heads the planning commission, last month announced that the warehouse would be moved unless the Cultural Assets Review Committee comes up with a conclusion convincing enough to make the commission reconsider its decision.
This flawed decisionmaking process and clear violation of procedure has imposed an arbitrary framework on the cultural committee, which should have led the discussions.
This type of confusion demonstrates that the city’s administrative bodies lack expertise and have not developed standard operating procedures — which Ko has always emphasized — and should be overhauled.
In fact, the Mitsui Warehouse’s fate would be a much better subject for “i-Voting” than the Dome’s if city government officials would take sufficient time to explain the pros and cons of all the options available and the associated traffic improvement plans being considered.
As the historic significance of buildings can change with the times, it would be much more sensible and objective to leave the decision to the masses rather than a select few.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs