On March 15, the organizers of last year’s Appendectomy Project (割闌尾計畫), a campaign to recall then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元), were fined NT$600,000 by the Taipei City Election Commission. On the surface, the Central Election Commission (CEC) does not seem to have been directly involved in the decision, but in reality it had much to do with it.
CEC Chairman Liu Yi-chou (劉義周) said during a legislative question-and-answer session that “the law banning campaigns to recall legislators is outdated and should be abolished,” and that he thinks “the case should not lead to any fines.”
Meanwhile, the commission turned down the request of the Taipei City Election Commission for a constitutional interpretation to resolve the controversy. The CEC knows what should be done, yet has done nothing. How can anyone not think its actions dubious?
Liu also said that whether the Appendectomy Project would be fined depended on the Taipei City Election Commission, adding that it would not intervene unless the commission clearly broke the law.
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) posted an acrostic poem online promoting the Appendectomy Project — with the first character of each line forming the phrase “more than half of the district must vote for the recall for it to pass.”
Ko also “stopped by” a recall campaign the night before the vote. It would be underestimating Ko’s popularity and influence to assume that his actions did not help to promote the recall bid at all. Furthermore, newly elected legislator and New Power Party Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has repeatedly admitted his direct involvement in the recall campaign.
That the Taipei City Election Commission has fined many participants of the Appendectomy Project, but not Ko and Huang, who both openly supported the project, should raise questions about whether the commission “clearly broke the law.” This is something Liu needs to explain.
In addition, the CEC insisted on combining the presidential and legislative elections, which has resulted in a four-month-long presidential transition period — the longest of all democratic nations in the world. What did the commission hope to achieve by this? The date of the election was also carefully selected to coincide with universities’ final exam day. Was this because the commission hoped to encourage students to vote — or to prevent them?
The CEC should be serving the interests of the nation and should avoid feuds between political parties. The discord between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and then-legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), was, in September 2013, at most an internal KMT matter. On Sept. 11 at 11:30am that year, the KMT’s Central Evaluation and Disciplinary Committee decided to revoke Wang’s membership.
The official document stating the decision was then sent to the CEC. The commission, without holding a meeting, quickly e-mailed the received document, along with proof that Wang was no longer qualified to be a legislator, to the legislature’s official e-mail address. The entire process — from the time the KMT’s Central Evaluation and Disciplinary Committee began its meeting to the time the CEC finished its procedures — took only nine hours. Never before had the CEC done anything with such efficiency.
By appearing to favor or looking after a particular political party, the CEC can only ruin its own reputation.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired professor from National Hsinchu University of Education and former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Yu-an Tu
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this