Nature has begun to fight back against the vast piles of filth dumped into its soils, rivers and oceans by evolving a plastic-eating bacteria — the first known to science.
In a report published in the journal Science, a team of Japanese researchers described a species of bacteria that can break the molecular bonds of one of the world’s most-used plastics — polyethylene terephthalate, also known as PET or polyester.
The Japanese research team sifted through hundreds of samples of PET pollution before finding a colony of organisms using the plastic as a food source.
Illustration: Mountain People
Further tests found the bacteria almost completely degraded low-quality plastic within six weeks. This was voracious when compared with other biological agents; including a related bacteria, leaf compost and a fungus enzyme recently found to have an appetite for PET.
“This is the first rigorous study — it appears to be very carefully done — that I have seen that shows plastic being hydrolyzed [broken down] by bacteria,” Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution researcher Tracy Mincer said.
The molecules that form PET are bonded very strongly, said Uwe Bornscheuer, a professor at the University of Greifswald, in an accompanying comment piece in Science.
“Until recently, no organisms were known to be able to decompose it,” he said.
In a Gaian twist, initial genetic examination revealed the bacteria, named Ideonella sakaiensis 201-F6, might have evolved enzymes specifically capable of breaking down PET in response to the accumulation of the plastic in the environment in the past 70 years.
Such rapid evolution was possible, said Enzo Palombo, a professor of microbiology at Swinburne University, given that microbes have an extraordinary ability to adapt to their surroundings.
“If you put a bacteria in a situation where they have only got one food source to consume, over time they will adapt to do that,” he said.
“I think we are seeing how nature can surprise us and in the end the resiliency of nature itself,” Mincer added.
The bacteria took longer to eat away highly crystalized PET, which is used in plastic bottles. That means the enzymes and processes would need refinement before they could be useful for industrial recycling or cleaning up pollution.
“It is difficult to break down highly crystalized PET,” said Kenji Miyamoto from Keio University, one of the authors of the study. “Our research results are just the initiation for the application. We have to work on so many issues needed for various applications. It takes a long time.”
A third of all plastics end up in the environment and 8 million tonnes end up in the ocean every year, creating vast accumulations of life-choking rubbish.
PET is said to make up almost one-sixth of the world’s annual plastic production of 311 million tonnes. Despite PET being one of the more commonly recycled plastics, the World Economic Forum (WEF) reports that only about half is ever collected for recycling and far less actually ends up being reused.
Bornscheuer said that advances in biodegradable plastics and recycling offer hope for the future, “but [this] does not help to get rid of the plastics already in the environment.”
However, the potential applications of the discovery remain unclear. The most obvious use would be as a biological agent in nature, Palombo said.
Bacteria could be sprayed on the huge floating trash heaps building up in the oceans. This method is most notably employed to combat oil spills.
This particular bacteria would not be useful for this process as it only consumes PET, which is too dense to float on water. However, Bornscheuer said the discovery could open the door to the discovery or manufacture of biological agents able to break down other plastics.
Palombo said the discovery suggested that other bacteria might have already evolved to do this job and simply needed to be found.
“I would not be surprised if samples of ocean plastics contained microbes that are happily growing on this material and could be isolated in the same manner,” he said.
However, Mincer said breaking down ocean rubbish came with dangers of its own. Plastics often contain additives that can be toxic when released. WEF estimates that the 150 million tonnes of plastic currently in the ocean contain roughly 23 million tonnes of additives.
“Plastic debris might have been less toxic in the whole unhydrolyzed form where it would ultimately have been buried in the sediments on a geological timescale,” Mincer said.
Beyond dealing with the plastic already fouling up the environment, the bacteria could potentially be used in industrial recycling processes.
“Certainly, the use of these microbes or enzymes could play a role in remediation of plastic in a controlled reactor,” Mincer said.
Miyamoto’s team suggested that the environmentally benign constituents left behind by the bacteria could be the same ones from which the plastic is formed. If this were true and a process could be developed to isolate them, Bornscheuer said:
“This could provide huge savings in the production of new polymer without the need for petrol-based starting materials,” he said.
According to the WEF, 6 percent of global oil production is devoted to the production of plastics.
However, the plastics industry said that the potential for a new biological process to replace or augment the current mechanical recycling process was relatively small.
“PET is 100 percent recyclable,” PET Manufacturers in Europe committee chairman Mike Neal said. “I expect that a biodegradation system would require a similar engineering process to chemical depolymerization and as such is unlikely to be economically viable.”
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his