Despite the pro-China Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) defeat in January’s presidential election, Beijing is still hopeful that president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) will pledge the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) allegiance to the “one China” principle when she is inaugurated as president on May 20.
During a session of China’s National People’s Congress on March 5, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強) reiterated the necessity of the so-called “1992 consensus” for positive cross-strait interactions based on “common political underpinning.”
On the heels of Xi and Li’s comments, Beijing-based All-China Federation of Taiwan Compatriots president and National People’s Congress member Wang Yifu (汪毅夫) called on the DPP to suspend its “Taiwanese independence” party platform.
However, none of these calls, which are expected from the Chinese, are more awkward or disconcerting than a recent warning from former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起), who admitted in 2000 that he had made up the term “1992 consensus.”
In an article published by the Chinese-language United Evening News on Monday last week, Su was quoted as saying that during a visit to Shanghai last month, he and Taipei Forum members were told to read an online article which was circulating among various Chinese departments that deal with Taiwan affairs. The article said that as peaceful cross-strait unification is no longer possible, China could start preparing itself for a war to conquer Taiwan by force, to be launched some time between January and May next year.
The article, penned by a self-declared Chinese sociologist living in the US, said that if the Taiwan “problem” does not get solved now, it would deteriorate and be procrastinated over forever.
“Since the chance that Tsai would openly endorse the ‘1992 consensus’ and that Taiwan and [China] belong to the same China is extremely slim, it is time for Beijing to prepare for war,” the man was quoted by the paper as saying.
Setting aside doubts over the veracity of members of the Chinese political establishment reading an article by a hawkish Chinese with no academic position in the US or China, Su, as an academic long-immersed in cross-strait affairs, should know better than to fall for such a scheme and be turned into a mouthpiece for the Chinese government.
It is even more regrettable that his assistance in conveying such a message has been assisted by the deep-blue camp, including the KMT’s clownish figure Chiu Yi (邱毅), who made a live call to the article’s author during a political television show on Monday.
The author responded by saying that Taiwanese should not blame China for waging a war and that “Taiwan’s independence-leaning party” is to blame.
The host claimed that the author’s comments “have made Taiwanese more familiar with what [the Chinese] public are thinking.”
Since January’s elections, Taiwanese have seen some intimidating sticks which embody the Chinese menace being wielded their way, including the call for a tighter “loyalty check” over Taiwanese businesspeople in China and the move to reduce the number of Chinese visitors to Taiwan. However, there have been no signs of any carrots.
Considering how Chinese domestic politics have played out recently, with Xi tightening his control and factional infighting rampant in the Chinese Communist Party, showcasing a resolute stance toward Taiwan is necessary for China’s leaders.
However, breaking the delicate cross-strait balance now is probably the last thing they want.
The DPP is going to have a difficult time maintaining its promise to Taiwanese and presenting a cross-strait position that is acceptable to Beijing. However, parroting a warmonger’s nonsense is the last thing the nation needs.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under