When it comes to the implementation of policies, efficiency is usually a favorable attribute. However, if a governing body wants to win the applause of its subjects, then the policies themselves must be in their best interests — otherwise an overemphasis on efficiency only ends up destroying their trust.
This is exactly the conundrum Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is facing.
Ko has attracted a lot of controversy over the past couple of weeks: There was the brouhaha over the residents’ vote concerning the future of Shezidao peninsula (社子島) — which was conducted online using a platform called “i-Voting,” his decision to push through a decision to install sensors for the eTag toll system at Taipei’s 52,000 public parking spaces and the Taipei City Government’s agreement with Taiwan Railways Administration to discard an iconic Taipei Railway Station sign.
The Shezidao vote, which took place late last month, saw a turnout of just 35 percent of all registered voters, of whom about 60 percent backed the “Ecological Shezidao” proposal for the development of the flood-detention area.
The plan garnered 3,032 votes from about 14,000 eligible voters in Shezidao — or only 21 percent.
Prior to the vote, some residents expressed dissatisfaction with the conditions of the proposals, saying that the floor space index the government set on new buildings was too low and that requirements needed to purchase interim housing were too strict.
The low voter turnout indicates that residents were disappointed with all four options Ko’s administration proposed for the area’s development, not to mention that many residents were probably unsure what they were voting for given the development plans’ abstruse designs and the insufficient time relevant agencies took to explain them.
With such an insufficient understanding of public opinion, Ko should not have decided to “just go ahead with the plan and make adjustments later,” but rather delayed the vote to allow more time for officials to better explain the proposals. Then, a consensus between residents and the city might have been reached.
Similarly, Ko should not have just decided that Taipei’s traffic congestion was mainly attributable to illegal parking and that eTag sensors would be installed without realizing the consequences such a move would have.
To begin with, the city’s parking management personnel — who make a living giving out parking invoices — would have to be laid off, in the same way that freeway toll collectors lost their jobs after toll collection became automated.
Ironically, Ko was a vocal supporter of the laid-off freeway toll collectors before he became mayor.
In addition, the sensors would cost the city an estimated NT$9.35 billion (US$281.4 million), a sum far in excess of the money needed to pay parking management personnel salaries.
None of that matters now. Ko has made the call and the sensors will be installed.
The removal of the railway station’s sign was just as despotic.
Since the station’s completion in 1989, the bilingual sign had given countless foreigners and locals new to Taipei information on their travel, telling them where to transfer, and how to link to other trains and Taipei’s mass rapid transit system.
It is infuriating that the city always claims that it values cultural assets yet still fails miserably to preserve what was probably the most definitive cultural asset in Taipei residents’ recent memory.
Ko is now in the US, busy trying to help Taiwanese high-tech firms attract investments from Silicon Valley, but his trip would have more value if he consulted his US counterparts on the role of the democratic process in public affairs — before he makes even more arbitrary decisions.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.