The race for the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) chairperson by-election officially started on Monday with four candidates registering. Former deputy legislative speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), whose presidential nomination was rescinded by the party last year, is considered to be the most likely candidate to win. It would be a victorious comeback for Hung, but would it be good news for the KMT?
Hung did not attend a debate organized by the pro-reform KMT sub-groups on Saturday, but her presence was felt nevertheless. Not only because the other three candidates were asked by the media to comment on Hung’s absence, or because Hung was said to have snubbed the debate as she believed she could win the election “lying down.”
Hung can be seen as an agenda setter even in a debate conducted without her, because none of the other candidates present a “real” alternative when it comes to key issues such as cross-strait relations and what stance the party should take when facing young people who are “naturally independence-leaning.” The three candidates who turned up for the debate said young people voted for change due to social justice issues rather than the political divide between the two major parties.
The lack of a “real” alternative was on show as the three candidates sidestepped or rephrased the “China problem” — independence versus unification — as local versus non-local, and dismissed the change in young people’s perception of history — a stance no different from Hung’s in terms of substance or direction. The difference lies only in extent.
During elections, political candidates usually tend to promote moderate ideas in a bid to capture the most votes. However, Hung holds the most extreme views of the four, yet she is winning. It can be asked, then, whether being more moderate, but remaining on the same ideological line with your opponent, could still be considered a winning strategy.
Hung’s likely victory might seem unthinkable, especially after she had her presidential candidacy rescinded due to her “unorthodox” political stance — as the KMT said during the election period — last year.
KMT members’ support for Hung, which has helped her secure more than 80,000 signatures — the most among the four candidates — might be interpreted as making amends for her, as she stepped forward to run for president, but ended up being humiliated by the party.
However, when the mentality of making amends becomes dominant in a race that might define the KMT’s position for the next few years, it remains to be seen whether the party remains hopeful of a possible return to power or if it turns itself into an entity that abides by Beijing’s ideology and becomes marginalized.
The Democratic Progressive Party’s situation in 2008, when it lost the presidency, serves as a contrast. Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who had been a new type of politician even within the DPP, won the chairpersonship in a head-to-head race — Chai Trong-rong (蔡同榮) had dropped out in the last minute — with Koo Kwang-ming (辜寬敏), a hardline Taiwanese independence advocate.
The DPP’s then-acting chairperson Frank Hsieh (謝長廷), despite meeting strong opposition, had opened up the electorate base by allowing young and new party members to vote in the Tsai-Koo race.
It would be difficult to say that the move determined the result of the election, but real action was taken.
The KMT by-election has been dominated by old politics so far. Hung is a supporter of the anachronistic myth that the Republic of China holds sovereignty over the whole of “China.”
KMT Acting Chairperson Huang Min-hui (黃敏惠), another possible winner, is the representative of the party’s factional politics. Former KMT legislator Apollo Chen (陳學聖) and Taipei City Councilor Lee Hsin (李新) are regarded as reformers, but that is probably why they have little chance of being elected.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations